AcTracer: Active Testing of Large Language Model via Multi-Stage Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performance evaluation plays a crucial role in the development life cycle of large language models (LLMs). It estimates the model's capability, elucidates behavior characteristics, and facilitates the identification of potential issues and limitations, thereby guiding further improvement. Given that LLMs' diverse task-handling abilities stem from large volumes of training data, a comprehensive evaluation also necessitates abundant, well-annotated, and representative test data to assess LLM performance across various downstream tasks. However, the demand for high-quality test data often entails substantial time, computational resources, and manual efforts, sometimes causing the evaluation to be inefficient or impractical. To address these challenges, researchers propose active testing, which estimates the overall performance by selecting a subset of test data. Nevertheless, the existing active testing methods tend to be inefficient, even inapplicable, given the unique new challenges of LLMs (e.g., diverse task types, increased model complexity, and unavailability of training data). To mitigate such limitations and expedite the development cycle of LLMs, in this work, we introduce AcTracer, an active testing framework tailored for LLMs that strategically selects a small subset of test data to achieve a more accurate performance estimation for LLMs. AcTracer utilizes both internal and external information from LLMs to guide the test sampling process, reducing variance through a multi-stage pool-based active selection. Our experiment results demonstrate that AcTracer achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to existing methods across various tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 72 of its 118 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2024.
Builds on
72 of 118 references.
References · 72
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
38 more
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 888
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2017Wasserstein GANcited by 635
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 486
- 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 389
- 2022A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real Worldcited by 337
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
- 2024Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biasescited by 314
- 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
- 2017DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systemscited by 307
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
- 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 302
- 2024TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Modelscited by 280
- 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 263
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
- 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
- 2024A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmeticcited by 188
- 2022A New Generation of Perspective API: Efficient Multilingual Character-level Transformerscited by 181
- 2023Benchmarking Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models as Evaluatorscited by 147
- 2021Q2: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answeringcited by 131
- 2018Guiding Deep Learning System Testing using Surprise Adequacycited by 123
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2023A Theory for Emergence of Complex Skills in Language Modelscited by 111
- 2020Are Labels Always Necessary for Classifier Accuracy Evaluation?cited by 104
- 2023LLM-Eval: Unified Multi-Dimensional Automatic Evaluation for Open-Domain Conversations with Large Language Modelscited by 100
50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 11.
16 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended Capabilitiescited by 13
- 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024Does Few-Shot Learning Help LLM Performance in Code Synthesis?cited by 6
- 2025DISCO: Diversifying Sample Condensation for Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 4
- 2026Active Testing of Large Language Models via Approximate Neyman Allocationcited by 4
- 2026Task-CoEvolve: Efficient Harness Optimization via Adaptive Validation Task Selectioncited by 3
- 2026Evaluating Cross-Modal Reasoning Ability and Problem Characteristics with Multimodal Item Response Theorycited by 2
- 2026ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluationcited by 2
- 2026Generative Active Testing: Efficient LLM Evaluation via Proxy Task Adaptationcited by 1
- 2026Offline Preference-Based Trajectory Evaluationcited by 1
- 2025Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotationscited by 0
- 2026RACC: Representation-Aware Coverage Criteria for LLM Safety Testingcited by 0
4 more
- 2026Fault-Tolerant Evaluation for Sample-Efficient Model Performance Estimatorscited by 0
- 2026Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotationscited by 0
- 2026Code-MUE: Measuring Code LLMs' Uncertainty through Execution-based Semantic Interaction Graphscited by 0
- 2026Prioritizing Repeated LLM Evaluation for Hidden Failure Discoverycited by 0
- 2026Prioritizing Repeated LLM Evaluation for Hidden Failure Discovery26 Sep 2026
- 2026Task-CoEvolve: Efficient Harness Optimization via Adaptive Validation Task Selection20 Aug 2026
- 2026Code-MUE: Measuring Code LLMs' Uncertainty through Execution-based Semantic Interaction Graphs14 Jul 2026
- 2026Offline Preference-Based Trajectory Evaluation16 Jun 2026
- 2026Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotations24 May 2026
- 2026Active Testing of Large Language Models via Approximate Neyman Allocation11 May 2026
- 2026ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluation25 Apr 2026
- 2026Evaluating Cross-Modal Reasoning Ability and Problem Characteristics with Multimodal Item Response Theory3 Mar 2026
- 2026Generative Active Testing: Efficient LLM Evaluation via Proxy Task Adaptation26 Feb 2026
- 2026Fault-Tolerant Evaluation for Sample-Efficient Model Performance Estimators6 Feb 2026
- 2026RACC: Representation-Aware Coverage Criteria for LLM Safety Testing2 Feb 2026
- 2025Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotations10 Oct 2025
4 more
- 2025DISCO: Diversifying Sample Condensation for Efficient Model Evaluation9 Oct 2025
- 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Models12 Aug 2025
- 2024ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended Capabilities9 Dec 2024
- 2024Does Few-Shot Learning Help LLM Performance in Code Synthesis?3 Dec 2024
- 2026Offline Preference-Based Trajectory Evaluationcited by 1
- 2026Offline Preference-Based Trajectory Evaluation16 Jun 2026
- 2024ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended Capabilitiescited by 13
- 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2025DISCO: Diversifying Sample Condensation for Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 4
- 2026Task-CoEvolve: Efficient Harness Optimization via Adaptive Validation Task Selectioncited by 3
- 2026ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluationcited by 2
- 2026Generative Active Testing: Efficient LLM Evaluation via Proxy Task Adaptationcited by 1
- 2025Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotationscited by 0
- 2026Fault-Tolerant Evaluation for Sample-Efficient Model Performance Estimatorscited by 0
- 2026Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotationscited by 0
- 2026Code-MUE: Measuring Code LLMs' Uncertainty through Execution-based Semantic Interaction Graphscited by 0
- 2026Prioritizing Repeated LLM Evaluation for Hidden Failure Discoverycited by 0
- 2026Prioritizing Repeated LLM Evaluation for Hidden Failure Discovery26 Sep 2026
- 2026Task-CoEvolve: Efficient Harness Optimization via Adaptive Validation Task Selection20 Aug 2026
- 2026Code-MUE: Measuring Code LLMs' Uncertainty through Execution-based Semantic Interaction Graphs14 Jul 2026
- 2026Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotations24 May 2026
- 2026ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluation25 Apr 2026
- 2026Generative Active Testing: Efficient LLM Evaluation via Proxy Task Adaptation26 Feb 2026
- 2026Fault-Tolerant Evaluation for Sample-Efficient Model Performance Estimators6 Feb 2026
- 2025Large Language Model Selection with Limited Annotations10 Oct 2025
- 2025DISCO: Diversifying Sample Condensation for Efficient Model Evaluation9 Oct 2025
- 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Models12 Aug 2025
- 2024ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended Capabilities9 Dec 2024