mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MLIP Detective: Active Failure Mode Discovery Beyond Benchmark Scores for Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials

arXiv 2609.08399 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2026cs.LG cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Universal machine-learning interatomic potentials (u-MLIPs) aim to generalize across diverse configurations. Benchmarks enable reproducible evaluation but may not expose failures outside their predefined scope. Here, we show that physics-informed search can complement benchmark-based evaluation by uncovering hidden failure modes. We introduce MLIP Detective, an agentic framework for active failure mode discovery. Starting from benchmark evidence, MLIP Detective generates falsifiable, physics-informed failure hypotheses, screens them with inexpensive simulations, and escalates only the most suspicious cases to human experts together with proposed verification protocols. Without issue-specific prompting, MLIP Detective identified and characterized a systematic anomaly in MACE-MPA-0: the model predicted some relaxed adsorbate-surface systems involving O- or F-containing adsorbates to be higher in energy than their corresponding separated fragments. Using cross-model comparisons, MLIP Detective further inferred a likely training-data origin for the anomaly, consistent with recent reports.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

Builds on

24 of 48 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
  2. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  3. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
  4. 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 205
  5. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 82
  6. 2021Active Testing: Sample-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 82
  7. 2024Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic Materials Dataset and Modelscited by 52
  8. 2022Active Surrogate Estimators: An Active Learning Approach to Label-Efficient Model Evaluationcited by 26
  9. 2021Differentiable sampling of molecular geometries with uncertainty-based adversarial attackscited by 25
  10. 2025FACT-AUDIT: An Adaptive Multi-Agent Framework for Dynamic Fact-Checking Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 19
  11. 2018Active Testing: An Efficient and Robust Framework for Estimating Accuracycited by 15
  12. 2026BenchGuard: Who Guards the Benchmarks? Automated Auditing of LLM Agent Benchmarkscited by 15
12 more
  1. 2026Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJackcited by 14
  2. 2025Scaling Up Active Testing to Large Language Modelscited by 13
  3. 2026Automated Benchmark Auditing for AI Agents and Large Language Modelscited by 12
  4. 2025MLIP Arena: Advancing Fairness and Transparency in Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials via an Open, Accessible Benchmark Platformcited by 9
  5. 2026ProbeLLM: Automating Principled Diagnosis of LLM Failurescited by 9
  6. 2025MOFSimBench: Evaluating Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials In Metal--Organic Framework Molecular Modelingcited by 7
  7. 2026MLIPilot: LLM-Driven Auto-Research for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentialscited by 3
  8. 2025Learning atomic forces from uncertainty-calibrated adversarial attackscited by 2
  9. 2026Better without U: Impact of Selective Hubbard U Correction on Foundational MLIPscited by 2
  10. 2026ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluationcited by 2
  11. 2026Lang2MLIP: End-to-End Language-to-Machine Learning Interatomic Potential Development with Autonomous Agentic Workflowscited by 2
  12. 2026Proof-Carrying Materials: Falsifiable Safety Certificates for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentialscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AdsMind: A Physics-Grounded Multi-Agent System for Self-Correcting Discovery of Adsorption Configurations on Heterogeneous Catalyst Surfaces
  2. 2026El Agente Potente: High-Throughput Agentic Atomistic Simulations
  3. 2026Physics-Aligned Electronic Ground-State Learning Improves Generalization
  4. 2025Ensemble Knowledge Distillation for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials
  5. 2026Mixture of experts architectures for machine learning interatomic potentials
  6. 2024Adsorb-Agent: Autonomous Identification of Stable Adsorption Configurations via Large Language Model Agent
  7. 2026Catalyst-Agent: Autonomous heterogeneous catalyst screening with an LLM Agent
  8. 2026Mixture of Experts Framework in Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials for Atomistic Simulations