mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to guide task and motion planning using score-space representation

arXiv 1807.09962 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2018cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 27

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose a learning algorithm that speeds up the search in task and motion planning problems. Our algorithm proposes solutions to three different challenges that arise in learning to improve planning efficiency: what to predict, how to represent a planning problem instance, and how to transfer knowledge from one problem instance to another. We propose a method that predicts constraints on the search space based on a generic representation of a planning problem instance, called score-space, where we represent a problem instance in terms of the performance of a set of solutions attempted so far. Using this representation, we transfer knowledge, in the form of constraints, from previous problems based on the similarity in score space. We design a sequential algorithm that efficiently predicts these constraints, and evaluate it in three different challenging task and motion planning problems. Results indicate that our approach performs orders of magnitudes faster than an unguided planner

Key facts. Cited by 27 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 7; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

27 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Pre-trained Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 63
  2. 2022TASKOGRAPHY: Evaluating robot task planning over large 3D scene graphscited by 59
  3. 2023Grammar Prompting for Domain-Specific Language Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 58
  4. 2021Learning Symbolic Operators for Task and Motion Planningcited by 57
  5. 2021NeRP: Neural Rearrangement Planning for Unknown Objectscited by 33
  6. 2021Efficient and Interpretable Robot Manipulation with Graph Neural Networkscited by 21
  7. 2024A Survey of Optimization-based Task and Motion Planning: From Classical To Learning Approachescited by 19
  8. 2021Guided Imitation of Task and Motion Planningcited by 18
  9. 2023Generalizable Long-Horizon Manipulations with Large Language Modelscited by 16
  10. 2021Reconstructing Interactive 3D Scenes by Panoptic Mapping and CAD Model Alignmentscited by 15
  11. 2021Efficient Task Planning for Mobile Manipulation: a Virtual Kinematic Chain Perspectivecited by 11
  12. 2022Accelerating Integrated Task and Motion Planning with Neural Feasibility Checkingcited by 10
15 more
  1. 2021Learning to Search in Task and Motion Planning with Streamscited by 9
  2. 2022Representation, learning, and planning algorithms for geometric task and motion planningcited by 8
  3. 2022A Survey on the Integration of Machine Learning with Sampling-based Motion Planningcited by 6
  4. 2022Pre-training helps Bayesian optimization toocited by 5
  5. 2022HyperBO+: Pre-training a universal prior for Bayesian optimization with hierarchical Gaussian processescited by 4
  6. 2024Closed Loop Interactive Embodied Reasoning for Robot Manipulationcited by 4
  7. 2025Prime the search: Using large language models for guiding geometric task and motion planning by warm-starting tree searchcited by 4
  8. 2023Anticipatory Planning: Improving Long-Lived Planning by Estimating Expected Cost of Future Taskscited by 2
  9. 2026ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluationcited by 2
  10. 2022Policy-Guided Lazy Search with Feedback for Task and Motion Planningcited by 1
  11. 2024RobKiNet: Robotic Kinematics Informed Neural Network for Optimal Robot Configuration Predictioncited by 1
  12. 2026Learning Bilevel Policies over Symbolic World Models for Long-Horizon Planningcited by 0
  13. 2026Learning Motion Feasibility from Point Clouds in Cluttered Environmentscited by 0
  14. 2026Courteous Anticipation: Improving Long-Lived Task Planning in Persistent Shared Environmentscited by 0
  15. 2026Macro-Operator Generation and Predicate Selection for TAMP Operator Learningcited by 0