mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Runtime Governance for AI Agents: Policies on Paths

arXiv 2603.16586 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 17

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents -- systems that plan, reason, and act using large language models -- produce non-deterministic, path-dependent behavior that cannot be fully governed at design time, where with governed we mean striking the right balance between as high as possible successful task completion rate and the legal, data-breach, reputational and other costs associated with running agents. We argue that the execution path is the central object for effective runtime governance and formalize compliance policies as deterministic functions mapping agent identity, partial path, proposed next action, and organizational state to a policy violation probability. We show that prompt-level instructions (and "system prompts"), and static access control are special cases of this framework: the former shape the distribution over paths without actually evaluating them; the latter evaluates deterministic policies that ignore the path (i.e., these can only account for a specific subset of all possible paths). In our view, runtime evaluation is the general case, and it is necessary for any path-dependent policy. We develop the formal framework for analyzing AI agent governance, present concrete policy examples (inspired by the AI act), discuss a reference implementation, and identify open problems including risk calibration and the limits of enforced compliance.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

Builds on

9 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Agent Behavioral Contracts: Formal Specification and Runtime Enforcement for Reliable Autonomous AI Agents25 Feb
  2. 2025MI9: An Integrated Runtime Governance Framework for Agentic AI5 Aug
  3. 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agents24 Mar

Other references · 6

  1. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  2. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  3. 2024AI Agents Under Threat: A Survey of Key Security Challenges and Future Pathwayscited by 122
  4. 2026Agent Drift: Quantifying Behavioral Degradation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Over Extended Interactionscited by 26
  5. 2026OpenClaw Agents on Moltbook: Risky Instruction Sharing and Norm Enforcement in an Agent-Only Social Networkcited by 19
  6. 2025Governance-as-a-Service: A Multi-Agent Framework for AI System Compliance and Policy Enforcementcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 17.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026From Governance Norms to Enforceable Controls: A Layered Translation Method for Runtime Guardrails in Agentic AIcited by 7
  2. 2026SARC: A Governance-by-Architecture Framework for Agentic AI Systemscited by 5
  3. 2026Beyond Task Success: An Evidence-Synthesis Framework for Evaluating, Governing, and Orchestrating Agentic AIcited by 2
  4. 2026MAGIQ: A Post-Quantum Multi-Agentic AI Governance System with Provable Securitycited by 2
  5. 2026PatchBoard: Schema-Grounded State Mutation for Reliable and Auditable LLM Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 2
  6. 2026Cheap Code, Costly Judgment: A Case Study on Governable Agentic Software Engineeringcited by 2
  7. 2026Correct Is Not Governed: Provenance Integrity in Agentic Workflowscited by 2
  8. 2026The Accountability Horizon: An Impossibility Theorem for Governing Human-Agent Collectivescited by 1
  9. 2026Governing What You Cannot Observe: Adaptive Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Agentscited by 1
  10. 2026Constraining Host-Level Abuse in Self-Hosted Computer-Use Agents via TEE-Backed Isolationcited by 1
  11. 2026Right-to-Act: A Pre-Execution Non-Compensatory Decision Protocol for AI Systemscited by 0
  12. 2026The Vulnerability With No CVE: Managing Persistent Gaps Between Mandate and Authority in AI Coding Agentscited by 0
5 more
  1. 2026Model-Based Agentic Software Engineeringcited by 0
  2. 2026Governance-as-Code: Translating EU AI Act Technical Requirements into Executable Compliance Pipelines for Generative AI Systemscited by 0
  3. 2026Epi-Logic: A Conceptual Framework for Epistemic Runtime Control, Schema Validity Checking, and Controlled Accommodation in Autonomous AI Agentscited by 0
  4. 2026Compliant with Local Controls, Collectively Discriminatory. A Governance Architecture for Multi-Agent AI in Regulated Financecited by 0
  5. 2026From Agent Output to Authorized Transitioncited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
  2. 2026A Five-Plane Reference Architecture for Runtime Governance of Production AI Agents
  3. 2026Runtime Governance for Agentic AI: Action-Boundary Control with Trusted Provenance and Fail-Closed Execution
  4. 2026VIGIL: Runtime Enforcement of Behavioral Specifications in AI Agent Skills
  5. 2026Governance by Construction for Generalist Agents
  6. 2026A pragmatic approach to regulating AI agents
  7. 2026Delegation Without Living Governance
  8. 2026Authorization Propagation in Multi-Agent AI Systems: Identity Governance as Infrastructure