Epi-Logic: A Conceptual Framework for Epistemic Runtime Control, Schema Validity Checking, and Controlled Accommodation in Autonomous AI Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous AI agents are increasingly deployed in areas where wrong decisions are hard to reverse. This paper examines schema mismatch: the condition in which an agent operates within an interpretive frame that no longer applies to the current context. Outputs produced under such a mismatch can appear internally consistent, linguistically plausible, and largely factually correct; output-quality metrics alone therefore capture the underlying loss of validity only partially. The paper introduces Epi-Logic, a conceptual framework for epistemic runtime control. It couples the detection of schema dissonance, a graduated reduction of autonomy, and the auditable switch to a validated schema. A schema is formalised as a tuple of variable space, expectation model, validity conditions, axioms, and metadata. The Epi-Score aggregates seven graded dimensions of epistemic dissonance; the temporal validity dimension D8, violations of the validity conditions G, and axiom violations are carried as separate categorical paths that are not offset against the aggregate. The architecture rests on a checking asymmetry: formalised validity conditions can be checked at runtime, whereas the correctness of many actions is established only ex post. The paper separates two architectural properties, a conditional result from sequential changepoint detection, and an empirical remainder. Eight falsifiable propositions with named baselines describe the transition to empirical validation. All propositions are empirically testable hypotheses, not established results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.
Builds on
37 of 51 references.
References · 37
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 604
- 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 436
- 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Modelscited by 398
- 2014Towards Open World Recognitioncited by 226
- 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agentscited by 223
- 2024A Chain-of-Thought Is as Strong as Its Weakest Link: A Benchmark for Verifiers of Reasoning Chainscited by 65
- 2026STALE: Can LLM Agents Know When Their Memories Are No Longer Valid?cited by 50
- 2024Towards Uncertainty-Aware Language Agentcited by 32
- 2025ProbGuard: Proactive Runtime Monitoring for LLM Agent Safety via Probabilistic Predictioncited by 28
- 2026Agent Drift: Quantifying Behavioral Degradation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Over Extended Interactionscited by 28
- 2023Open-World Continual Learning: Unifying Novelty Detection and Continual Learningcited by 22
25 more
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agents: Foundations, Emerging Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 20
- 2025MI9: An Integrated Runtime Governance Framework for Agentic AIcited by 19
- 2026Runtime Governance for AI Agents: Policies on Pathscited by 18
- 2026From Spark to Fire: Modeling and Mitigating Error Cascades in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 14
- 2026Temporal Validity in Retrieval Memory: Eliminating Stale-Fact Errors for AI Agents over Evolving Knowledgecited by 14
- 2025Stop Wasting Your Tokens: Towards Efficient Runtime Multi-Agent Systemscited by 12
- 2025Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligencecited by 11
- 2020Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
- 2026On the Reliability Limits of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Planningcited by 8
- 2026From Governance Norms to Enforceable Controls: A Layered Translation Method for Runtime Guardrails in Agentic AIcited by 7
- 2026Harnessing Embodied Agents: Runtime Governance for Policy-Constrained Executioncited by 7
- 2025Beyond transparency: computational reliabilism as an externalist epistemology of algorithmscited by 4
- 2025Facts Fade Fast: Evaluating Memorization of Outdated Medical Knowledge in Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026Semantic Laundering in AI Agent Architectures: Why Tool Boundaries Do Not Confer Epistemic Warrantcited by 4
- 2026A Control-Theoretic Foundation for Agentic Systemscited by 4
- 2026Memory-Induced Tool-Drift in LLM Agentscited by 4
- 2026AI-Assisted Engineering Should Track the Epistemic Status and Temporal Validity of Architectural Decisionscited by 3
- 2026Safe Multi-Agent Behavior Must Be Maintained, Not Merely Asserted: Constraint Drift in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 3
- 2026When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 3
- 2026Position: Evaluation Scores Are Perishable Knowledge Claimscited by 3
- 2026Hallucination as Context Drift: Synchronization Protocols for Multi-Agent LLM Systemscited by 2
- 2026Universe Routing: Why Self-Evolving Agents Need Epistemic Controlcited by 1
- 2026Governing What You Cannot Observe: Adaptive Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Agentscited by 1
- 2026The Geometry of Forgetting: Temporal Knowledge Drift as an Independent Axis in LLM Representationscited by 1
- 2026Bistable by Construction: Wall-Clock-Calibrated State Monitors Have No Moment-Detection Regime at Agent Cadencecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.