mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Governance-as-a-Service: A Multi-Agent Framework for AI System Compliance and Policy Enforcement

arXiv 2508.18765 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2025cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI systems evolve into distributed ecosystems with autonomous execution, asynchronous reasoning, and multi-agent coordination, the absence of scalable, decoupled governance poses a structural risk. Existing oversight mechanisms are reactive, brittle, and embedded within agent architectures, making them non-auditable and hard to generalize across heterogeneous deployments. We introduce Governance-as-a-Service (GaaS): a modular, policy-driven enforcement layer that regulates agent outputs at runtime without altering model internals or requiring agent cooperation. GaaS employs declarative rules and a Trust Factor mechanism that scores agents based on compliance and severity-weighted violations. It enables coercive, normative, and adaptive interventions, supporting graduated enforcement and dynamic trust modulation. To evaluate GaaS, we conduct three simulation regimes with open-source models (LLaMA3, Qwen3, DeepSeek-R1) across content generation and financial decision-making. In the baseline, agents act without governance; in the second, GaaS enforces policies; in the third, adversarial agents probe robustness. All actions are intercepted, evaluated, and logged for analysis. Results show that GaaS reliably blocks or redirects high-risk behaviors while preserving throughput. Trust scores track rule adherence, isolating and penalizing untrustworthy components in multi-agent systems. By positioning governance as a runtime service akin to compute or storage, GaaS establishes infrastructure-level alignment for interoperable agent ecosystems. It does not teach agents ethics; it enforces them.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.

Builds on

5 of 15 references.

References · 5

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2016Cooperative Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 300
  3. 2021Process for Adapting Language Models to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted Datasetscited by 181
  4. 2025LOKA Protocol: A Decentralized Framework for Trustworthy and Ethical AI Agent Ecosystemscited by 16
  5. 2025Enforcement Agents: Enhancing Accountability and Resilience in Multi-Agent AI Frameworkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 16.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026A Survey of Agentic AI and Cybersecurity: Challenges, Opportunities and Use-case Prototypescited by 22
  2. 2026Runtime Governance for AI Agents: Policies on Pathscited by 18
  3. 2025Towards Responsible and Explainable AI Agents with Consensus-Driven Reasoningcited by 14
  4. 2026Right to History: A Sovereignty Kernel for Verifiable AI Agent Executioncited by 7
  5. 2026AI Trust OS -- A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environmentscited by 4
  6. 2026Ontology-Constrained Neural Reasoning in Enterprise Agentic Systems: A Neurosymbolic Architecture for Domain-Grounded AI Agentscited by 3
  7. 2026FAVA: Formal Authorization for Verified Agents with Evidence-Backed Permission Graphscited by 3
  8. 2026Prose2Policy (P2P): A Practical LLM Pipeline for Translating Natural-Language Access Policies into Executable Regocited by 1
  9. 2026Governing What You Cannot Observe: Adaptive Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Agentscited by 1
  10. 2026Governing What the EU AI Act Excludes: Accountability for Autonomous AI Agents in Smart City Critical Infrastructurecited by 1
  11. 2026Governance by Construction for Generalist Agentscited by 1
  12. 2026KYA: A Framework-Agnostic Trust Layer for Autonomous Systems with Verifiable Provenance and Hierarchical Policy Compositioncited by 0
5 more
  1. 2026Overcoming the Regulatory Bottleneck via Agent-to-Agent Protocols: A Nuclear Case Studycited by 0
  2. 2026Where Reliability Lives: Experimental Localisation of Behavioural Properties in an Agent Systemcited by 0
  3. 2026Beyond Training: A Feasibility Taxonomy for Inference-Time AI Governancecited by 0
  4. 2026Governance-as-Code: Translating EU AI Act Technical Requirements into Executable Compliance Pipelines for Generative AI Systemscited by 0
  5. 2026Structured Decomposition for Reliable LLM-Generated Access Control Policiescited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
  2. 2026The Importance of Out-of-Band Metadata for Safe Autonomous Agents: The Redpanda Agentic Data Plane
  3. 2026A Unified Policy Architecture (UPA): The Governance Kernel for Enterprise AI Operating Systems
  4. 2026SARC: A Governance-by-Architecture Framework for Agentic AI Systems
  5. 2026Deontic Policies for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems
  6. 2025MI9: An Integrated Runtime Governance Framework for Agentic AI
  7. 2026I Can't Believe It's Corrupt: Evaluating Corruption in Multi-Agent Governance Systems
  8. 2025AGENTSAFE: A Unified Framework for Ethical Assurance and Governance in Agentic AI