A pragmatic approach to regulating AI agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
The current advancement in and deployment of agentic AI systems has created a set of key challenges for the legal frameworks that govern their use. We cover two central components: first, the regulatory classification of agents under the EU AI Act, and second, the legal status and validity of autonomous actions within the established framework of EU contract law. We argue that the unique capacity of agents to autonomously reason, plan, and execute tasks across disparate external systems necessitates a fundamental shift in oversight toward the orchestration layer, where multi-agent interactions introduce novel risks of misalignment. While agents generally utilise general-purpose AI models, we posit that their structural complexity and cross-system permeability require them to be regulated as "AI systems" with distinct obligations under the AI Act. Consequently, our proposals highlight the need for robust accountability mechanisms to manage this heightened autonomy. On the contractual side, we advocate for a "traffic light" system of staggered task authorization based on operational risk and the creation of a statutory list of non-delegable legal acts. By implementing these measures, we provide a pragmatic pathway to ensure that the increasing autonomy of AI agents remains firmly anchored in human accountability and existing legal standards
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Inferential Capability Does Not Determine Legal Scopecited by 0
- 2026Inferential Capability Does Not Determine Legal Scope11 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Mind The Gap: How The Technical Mechanism Of Agentic AI Outpace Global Legal Frameworks
- 2026Security, privacy, and agentic AI in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections
- 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
- 2026Separating Capability from Permission: A Governance Framework for Agentic AI Autonomy Levels
- 2026Autonomy and Agency in Agentic AI: Architectural Tactics for Regulated Contexts
- 2026Regulating autonomous and agentic AI
- 2025AI Agents and the Law
- 2026OpenAgentFlow: Enabling System-Wide Safety Boundaries for Heterogeneous AI Agent Fleets