Authorization Propagation in Multi-Agent AI Systems: Identity Governance as Infrastructure
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
The security discussion around agentic AI focuses heavily on prompt injection. This paper argues that multi-agent systems also create a distinct authorization problem: maintaining authorization invariants as non-human principals retrieve data, delegate tasks, and synthesize results across changing boundaries. We call this problem authorization propagation. It is not reducible to prompt injection and is not fully addressed by classical access-control models such as RBAC, ABAC, or ReBAC. The paper formalizes authorization propagation as a workflow-level property, identifies three sub-problems (transitive delegation, aggregation inference, and temporal validity), and derives seven structural requirements for authorization architectures in multi-agent AI systems. Recent work on invocation-bound capability tokens, task-scoped authorization envelopes, dependency-graph policy enforcement, and execution-count revocation demonstrates that the field is converging on the problem, but not yet on a complete architecture. The central claim is that identity governance must be treated as infrastructure: evaluated continuously, enforced at every interaction boundary, and designed into the system before orchestration logic is allowed to scale. Preliminary implementation evidence from a production enterprise AI platform shows that ordinary system behavior, not only adversarial action, already produces the failures this model predicts.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
1 of 26 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026MasDrift: Benchmarking Authorization Preservation Across Multi-Agent Architecturescited by 3
- 2026Multi-Agent AI Safety as an Institutional Design Problemcited by 1
- 2026Execution Envelopes: A Shared Admission Contract for Backend AI Execution Requestscited by 0
- 2026Where Is the Tradeoff in Using Third-Party API Routers for Agentic Software Development?cited by 0
- 2026Binding Biometrics with AI Agent Identifiers for Delegation of Authoritycited by 0
- 2026Authorization for Self-Modifying AI Agent Populations: Conserving Authority across Replacement, Forking, and Rollbackcited by 0
- 2026Authorization for Self-Modifying AI Agent Populations: Conserving Authority across Replacement, Forking, and Rollback29 Sep 2026
- 2026Multi-Agent AI Safety as an Institutional Design Problem10 Aug 2026
- 2026Binding Biometrics with AI Agent Identifiers for Delegation of Authority4 Aug 2026
- 2026MasDrift: Benchmarking Authorization Preservation Across Multi-Agent Architectures2 Aug 2026
- 2026Where Is the Tradeoff in Using Third-Party API Routers for Agentic Software Development?26 Jul 2026
- 2026Execution Envelopes: A Shared Admission Contract for Backend AI Execution Requests8 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Overlaying Governance: A Compositional Authorization Framework for Delegation and Scope in Agentic AI
- 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
- 2026Digital Identity for Agentic Systems: Toward a Portable Authorization Standard for Autonomous Agents
- 2026Cryptographically verifiable authorization for autonomous AI agents: a falsifiable hypothesis and proof of concept
- 2026A Theory of Least Autonomy in AI
- 2026Authorization Architectures for Tool-Using AI Agents
- 2026Runtime Governance for AI Agents: Policies on Paths
- 2026Delegation Without Trust: An Empirical Gap Analysis of Identity, Authorization, and Runtime Governance in Multi-Agent LLM Systems