mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Governing What You Cannot Observe: Adaptive Runtime Governance for Autonomous AI Agents

arXiv 2604.24686 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous AI agents can remain fully authorized and still become unsafe as behavior drifts, adversaries adapt, and decision patterns shift without any code change. We propose the Informational Viability Principle: governing an agent reduces to estimating a bound on unobserved risk hatB(x) = U(x) + SB(x) + RG(x) and allowing an action only when its capacity S(x) exceeds hatB(x) by a safety margin. The Agent Viability Framework, grounded in Aubin's viability theory, establishes three properties -- monitoring (P1), anticipation (P2), and monotonic restriction (P3) -- as individually necessary and collectively sufficient for documented failure modes. RiskGate instantiates the framework with dedicated statistical estimators (KL divergence, segment-vs-rest z-tests, sequential pattern matching), a fail-secure monotonic pipeline, and a closed-loop Autopilot formalised as an instance of Aubin's regulation map with kill-switch-as-last-resort; a scalar Viability Index VI(t) ∈ [-1,+1] with first-order t^* prediction transforms governance from reactive to predictive. Contributions are the theoretical framework, the reference implementation, and analytical coverage against published agent-failure taxonomies; quantitative empirical evaluation is scoped as follow-up work.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2026.

Builds on

9 of 41 references.

References · 9

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  3. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
  4. 2024Cedar: A New Language for Expressive, Fast, Safe, and Analyzable Authorization (Extended Version)cited by 31
  5. 2026Agent Drift: Quantifying Behavioral Degradation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Over Extended Interactionscited by 26
  6. 2026Agent Behavioral Contracts: Formal Specification and Runtime Enforcement for Reliable Autonomous AI Agentscited by 18
  7. 2026Runtime Governance for AI Agents: Policies on Pathscited by 17
  8. 2025Governance-as-a-Service: A Multi-Agent Framework for AI System Compliance and Policy Enforcementcited by 15
  9. 2025Invitation Is All You Need! Promptware Attacks Against LLM-Powered Assistants in Production Are Practical and Dangerouscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.