mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What Do LLM Agents Know About Their World? Task2Quiz: A Paradigm for Studying Environment Understanding

arXiv 2601.09503 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2026cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex decision-making and tool-use tasks, yet their ability to generalize across varying environments remains a under-examined concern. Current evaluation paradigms predominantly rely on trajectory-based metrics that measure task success, while failing to assess whether agents possess a grounded, transferable model of the environment. To address this gap, we propose Task-to-Quiz (T2Q), a deterministic and automated evaluation paradigm designed to decouple task execution from world-state understanding. We instantiate this paradigm in T2QBench, a suite comprising 30 environments and 1,967 grounded QA pairs across multiple difficulty levels. Our extensive experiments reveal that task success is often a poor proxy for environment understanding, and that current memory machanism can not effectively help agents acquire a grounded model of the environment. These findings identify proactive exploration and fine-grained state representation as primary bottlenecks, offering a robust foundation for developing more generalizable autonomous agents.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2026.

Builds on

26 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Position: The Real Barrier to LLM Agent Usability is Agentic ROI23 May
  2. 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents20 Mar
  3. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug

Other references · 23

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  2. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  3. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  4. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  5. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
  6. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memorycited by 722
  7. 2024WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 424
  8. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 359
  9. 2018TextWorld: A Learning Environment for Text-based Gamescited by 304
  10. 2024CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challengescited by 278
  11. 2019Interactive Fiction Games: A Colossal Adventurecited by 165
  12. 2025WebAgent-R1: Training Web Agents via End-to-End Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learningcited by 162
11 more
  1. 2024BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Gamescited by 141
  2. 2023SmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agentscited by 123
  3. 2025A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agentscited by 104
  4. 2024GameBench: Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLM Agentscited by 89
  5. 2024How Far Are We on the Decision-Making of LLMs? Evaluating LLMs' Gaming Ability in Multi-Agent Environmentscited by 66
  6. 2023Clembench: Using Game Play to Evaluate Chat-Optimized Language Models as Conversational Agentscited by 52
  7. 2025A Survey on Large Language Models with some Insights on their Capabilities and Limitationscited by 41
  8. 2023GameEval: Evaluating LLMs on Conversational Gamescited by 35
  9. 2024LLMArena: Assessing Capabilities of Large Language Models in Dynamic Multi-Agent Environmentscited by 35
  10. 2024GameArena: Evaluating LLM Reasoning through Live Computer Gamescited by 32
  11. 2025TextQuests: How Good are LLMs at Text-Based Video Games?cited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025GroundAct: Can LLM Agents Ground Actions in Environmental States?
  2. 2025Benchmarking World-Model Learning with Environment-Level Queries
  3. 2025R-WoM: Retrieval-augmented World Model For Computer-use Agents
  4. 2026Agent-Editing World Model: Rethinking World Modeling for LLM Agents
  5. 2026Ask the World Before Acting: Environment Probing for Calibrated Agent World Models
  6. 2026From Traces to Agentic Worlds: Agentic Language World Models for Interactive Environment Simulation
  7. 2026Agents Explore but Agents Ignore: LLMs Lack Environmental Curiosity
  8. 2025KnowMap: Efficient Knowledge-Driven Task Adaptation for LLMs