mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TRAVL: A Recipe for Making Video-Language Models Better Judges of Physics Implausibility

arXiv 2510.07550 ↗First posted 8 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite impressive visual fidelity, modern video generative models frequently produce sequences that violate intuitive physical laws, such as objects floating, teleporting, or morphing in ways that defy causality. While humans can easily detect such implausibilities, there remains no robust method for quantitatively assessing physical realism in video. In this work, we explore whether Video-Language Models (VLMs) can be trained to serve as reliable judges of physical plausibility. We find that existing VLMs struggle to identify physics violations, exposing fundamental limitations in their temporal and causal reasoning. To address this, we introduce TRAVL, a fine-tuning recipe that combines a balanced training dataset with a trajectory-aware attention module to improve motion encoding and discrimination in VLMs. To evaluate physical reasoning more rigorously, we propose ImplausiBench, a benchmark of 300 videos (150 real, 150 generated) that removes linguistic biases and isolates visual-temporal understanding. Performance is reported both with gold-standard human judgments and stricter LLM-as-judge metrics. Together, TRAVL and ImplausiBench offer a unified framework for probing and improving physical plausibility in multimodal models, shedding light on a challenging and underexplored aspect of visual-temporal understanding.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.

Builds on

39 of 54 references.

References · 39

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  4. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  5. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
  6. 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
  7. 2024HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Modelscited by 1,660
  8. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  9. 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,234
  10. 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,109
  11. 2023Video-ChatGPT: Towards Detailed Video Understanding via Large Vision and Language Modelscited by 1,062
  12. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,050
27 more
  1. 2024WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulatorscited by 881
  2. 2024LLaVA-Video: Video Instruction Tuning With Synthetic Datacited by 583
  3. 2024LTX-Video: Realtime Video Latent Diffusioncited by 581
  4. 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 494
  5. 2022InternVideo: General Video Foundation Models via Generative and Discriminative Learningcited by 447
  6. 2024Pyramidal Flow Matching for Efficient Video Generative Modelingcited by 366
  7. 2024TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?cited by 363
  8. 2021Keeping Your Eye on the Ball: Trajectory Attention in Video Transformerscited by 224
  9. 2024Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generationcited by 174
  10. 2023FLATTEN: optical FLow-guided ATTENtion for consistent text-to-video editingcited by 167
  11. 2025Do generative video models understand physical principles?cited by 161
  12. 2025PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understandingcited by 160
  13. 2025VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generationcited by 149
  14. 2019PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoningcited by 137
  15. 2024LLM-SR: Scientific Equation Discovery via Programming with Large Language Modelscited by 133
  16. 2025VideoJAM: Joint Appearance-Motion Representations for Enhanced Motion Generation in Video Modelscited by 113
  17. 2025MotionBench: Benchmarking and Improving Fine-grained Video Motion Understanding for Vision Language Modelscited by 70
  18. 2024Trajectory Attention for Fine-grained Video Motion Controlcited by 63
  19. 2019Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoningcited by 61
  20. 2025From Foresight to Forethought: VLM-In-the-Loop Policy Steering via Latent Alignmentcited by 52
  21. 2025Evaluating Newtonian Mechanics in Video Generative Models with Real Physical Systemscited by 48
  22. 2024MEGA-Bench: Scaling Multimodal Evaluation to over 500 Real-World Taskscited by 41
  23. 2017Video Question Answering via Attribute-Augmented Attention Network Learningcited by 39
  24. 2024LLMPhy: Parameter-Identifiable Physical Reasoning Combining Large Language Models and Physics Enginescited by 30
  25. 2024KiVA: Kid-inspired Visual Analogies for Testing Large Multimodal Modelscited by 24
  26. 2025Impossible Videoscited by 16
  27. 2025OmnimatteZero: Fast Training-free Omnimatte with Pre-trained Video Diffusion Modelscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 15.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025What about gravity in video generation? Post-Training Newton's Laws with Verifiable Rewardscited by 25
  2. 2026PhyGround: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning in Generative World Modelscited by 12
  3. 2026VOID: Video Object and Interaction Deletioncited by 9
  4. 2026RoboCurate: Harnessing Diversity with Action-Verified Neural Trajectory for Robot Learningcited by 8
  5. 2026VisPhyWorld: Probing Physical Reasoning via Code-Driven Video Reconstructioncited by 7
  6. 2026VBVR-Pro: A Scalable and Verifiable Suite for Native Visual Reasoningcited by 6
  7. 2025MASS: Motion-Aware Spatial-Temporal Grounding for Physics Reasoning and Comprehension in Vision-Language Modelscited by 5
  8. 2025Objects in Generated Videos Are Slower Than They Appear: Models Suffer Sub-Earth Gravity and Don't Know Galileo's Principle...for nowcited by 5
  9. 2026GS-Agent: Creating 4D Physical Worlds With Generative Simulationcited by 5
  10. 2026GEOPHYS: The Geometry of Physical Plausibilitycited by 3
  11. 2026PhysWeep: Does a Video Generator Realize the Physics You Ask For?cited by 2
  12. 20263DSPA: A 3D Semantic Point Autoencoder for Evaluating Video Realismcited by 0
6 more
  1. 2026From Priors to Perception: Grounding Video-LLMs in Physical Realitycited by 0
  2. 2026PhysMRV: Physical Memory Retrieval and Verification for Physics Plausibility Reasoningcited by 0
  3. 2026FADE: From Passive Verification to Active Discovery in Counterfactual Video Understandingcited by 0
  4. 2026PhyProbe: Rethinking Physical Consistency Evaluation in Generated Videoscited by 0
  5. 2026PhysCodeGym: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Physically Verifiable 4D Reconstructioncited by 0
  6. 2026PhyMetric: Diagnosing Physical Plausibility in Text-to-Video Generation via Scene-Level QAcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Physion-Eval: Evaluating Physical Realism in Generated Video via Human Reasoning
  2. 2025PhyDetEx: Detecting and Explaining the Physical Plausibility of T2V Models
  3. 2026PhysicsMind: Sim and Real Mechanics Benchmarking for Physical Reasoning and Prediction in Foundational VLMs and World Models
  4. 2025PhysVidBench: Language-Grounded Evaluation of Physical Commonsense in Text-to-Video Models
  5. 2025"PhyWorldBench": A Comprehensive Evaluation of Physical Realism in Text-to-Video Models
  6. 2025Enhancing Physical Plausibility in Video Generation by Reasoning the Implausibility
  7. 2026CausalMotion: Structured Physical Reasoning as Keyframe and Trajectory Guidance for Training-Free Video Generation
  8. 2026PhysicsLENS: Diagnosing Physical Property Blindness in Video Generation Models