mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

VisPhyWorld: Probing Physical Reasoning via Code-Driven Video Reconstruction

arXiv 2602.13294 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating whether Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) genuinely reason about physical dynamics remains challenging. Most existing benchmarks rely on recognition-style protocols such as Visual Question Answering (VQA) and Violation of Expectation (VoE), which can often be answered without committing to an explicit, testable physical hypothesis. We propose VisPhyWorld, an execution-based framework that evaluates physical reasoning by requiring models to generate executable simulator code from visual observations. By producing runnable code, the inferred world representation is directly inspectable, editable, and falsifiable. This separates physical reasoning from rendering. Building on this framework, we introduce VisPhyBench, comprising 209 evaluation scenes derived from 108 physical templates and a systematic protocol that evaluates how well models reconstruct appearance and reproduce physically plausible motion. Our pipeline produces valid reconstructed videos in 97.7% of benchmark runs before fallback. Experiments show that while state-of-the-art MLLMs achieve strong semantic scene understanding, they struggle to accurately infer physical parameters and to simulate consistent physical dynamics. Our code is available https://github.com/TIGER-AI-Lab/VisPhyWorld

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 47 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

Builds on

47 of 62 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025PhyX: Does Your Model Have the "Wits" for Physical Reasoning?21 May

Other references · 46

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2023Stable Video Diffusion: Scaling Latent Video Diffusion Models to Large Datasetscited by 2,526
  6. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,385
  7. 2025Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AIcited by 833
  8. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  9. 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
  10. 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 249
  11. 2024VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generationcited by 215
  12. 2024How Far is Video Generation from World Model: A Physical Law Perspectivecited by 204
34 more
  1. 2024VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generationcited by 190
  2. 2023TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering datasetcited by 189
  3. 2024PhysGen: Rigid-Body Physics-Grounded Image-to-Video Generationcited by 169
  4. 2024Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generationcited by 167
  5. 2025Do generative video models understand physical principles?cited by 151
  6. 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 145
  7. 2025VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generationcited by 141
  8. 2019PHYRE: A New Benchmark for Physical Reasoningcited by 137
  9. 2025WorldModelBench: Judging Video Generation Models As World Modelscited by 116
  10. 2024MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualizationcited by 98
  11. 2023StarVector: Generating Scalable Vector Graphics Code from Images and Textcited by 96
  12. 2019CoPhy: Counterfactual Learning of Physical Dynamicscited by 80
  13. 2024MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMscited by 72
  14. 2025OmniSVG: A Unified Scalable Vector Graphics Generation Modelcited by 71
  15. 2025Intuitive physics understanding emerges from self-supervised pretraining on natural videoscited by 66
  16. 2023GPT4Motion: Scripting Physical Motions in Text-to-Video Generation via Blender-Oriented GPT Planningcited by 61
  17. 2025Embodied AI Agents: Modeling the Worldcited by 57
  18. 2023Physion++: Evaluating Physical Scene Understanding that Requires Online Inference of Different Physical Propertiescited by 53
  19. 2025IntPhys 2: Benchmarking Intuitive Physics Understanding In Complex Synthetic Environmentscited by 49
  20. 2025VideoScore2: Think before You Score in Generative Video Evaluationcited by 37
  21. 2025A Shortcut-aware Video-QA Benchmark for Physical Understanding via Minimal Video Pairscited by 30
  22. 2023GRASP: A novel benchmark for evaluating language GRounding And Situated Physics understanding in multimodal language modelscited by 28
  23. 2024Drawing Pandas: A Benchmark for LLMs in Generating Plotting Codecited by 21
  24. 2025PlotGen: Multi-Agent LLM-based Scientific Data Visualization via Multimodal Feedbackcited by 19
  25. 2020ESPRIT: Explaining Solutions to Physical Reasoning Taskscited by 16
  26. 2024Kubrick: Multimodal Agent Collaborations for Synthetic Video Generationcited by 16
  27. 2025TRAVL: A Recipe for Making Video-Language Models Better Judges of Physics Implausibilitycited by 16
  28. 2023I-PHYRE: Interactive Physical Reasoningcited by 15
  29. 2025VCode: a Multimodal Coding Benchmark with SVG as Symbolic Visual Representationcited by 15
  30. 2024Do LLMs Understand Ambiguity in Text? A Case Study in Open-world Question Answeringcited by 13
  31. 2025VisCoder: Fine-Tuning LLMs for Executable Python Visualization Code Generationcited by 13
  32. 2023Editing Motion Graphics Video via Motion Vectorization and Transformationcited by 8
  33. 2023Benchmarks for Physical Reasoning AIcited by 8
  34. 2025VisCoder2: Building Multi-Language Visualization Coding Agentscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ChronoPhyBench: Do MLLMs Truly Understand the World or Merely Exploit Language Priors?
  2. 2026Beyond Static Vision: Scene Dynamic Field Unlocks Intuitive Physics Understanding in Multi-modal Large Language Models
  3. 2026PhysMRV: Physical Memory Retrieval and Verification for Physics Plausibility Reasoning
  4. 2026PhysicsMind: Sim and Real Mechanics Benchmarking for Physical Reasoning and Prediction in Foundational VLMs and World Models
  5. 2025Seeing is Not Reasoning: MVPBench for Graph-based Evaluation of Multi-path Visual Physical CoT
  6. 2025InPhyRe Discovers: Large Multimodal Models Struggle in Inductive Physical Reasoning
  7. 2026PhysMind: From Video to Executable Worlds for Training-Free Physical Reasoning
  8. 2026PhysVista: Benchmarking Physical Intelligence in VLMs via a Perception-Reasoning-Assessment Loop