mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PhyDetEx: Detecting and Explaining the Physical Plausibility of T2V Models

arXiv 2512.01843 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2025cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Driven by the growing capacity and training scale, Text-to-Video (T2V) generation models have recently achieved substantial progress in video quality, length, and instruction-following capability. However, whether these models can understand physics and generate physically plausible videos remains a question. While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been widely used as general-purpose evaluators in various applications, they struggle to identify the physically impossible content from generated videos. To investigate this issue, we construct a PID (Physical Implausibility Detection) dataset, which consists of a textittest split of 500 manually annotated videos and a textittrain split of 2,588 paired videos, where each implausible video is generated by carefully rewriting the caption of its corresponding real-world video to induce T2V models producing physically implausible content. With the constructed dataset, we introduce a lightweight fine-tuning approach, enabling VLMs to not only detect physically implausible events but also generate textual explanations on the violated physical principles. Taking the fine-tuned VLM as a physical plausibility detector and explainer, namely PhyDetEx, we benchmark a series of state-of-the-art T2V models to assess their adherence to physical laws. Our findings show that although recent T2V models have made notable progress toward generating physically plausible content, understanding and adhering to physical laws remains a challenging issue, especially for open-source models. Our dataset, training code, and checkpoints are available at hrefhttps://github.com/Zeqing-Wang/PhyDetExhttps://github.com/Zeqing-Wang/PhyDetEx.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.

Builds on

48 of 56 references.

References · 48

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  3. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  4. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
  5. 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,536
  6. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,534
  7. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  8. 2024CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformercited by 2,198
  9. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  10. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  11. 2024HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Modelscited by 1,597
  12. 2024Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scalingcited by 1,573
36 more
  1. 2024MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phonecited by 1,061
  2. 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,033
  3. 2014Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generatorcited by 877
  4. 2024WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulatorscited by 867
  5. 2025Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretrainingcited by 855
  6. 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledgecited by 702
  7. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 591
  8. 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 507
  9. 2025VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulnesscited by 289
  10. 2024VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generationcited by 215
  11. 2024AnyGPT: Unified Multimodal LLM with Discrete Sequence Modelingcited by 213
  12. 2024How Far is Video Generation from World Model: A Physical Law Perspectivecited by 204
  13. 2024VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generationcited by 190
  14. 2024Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generationcited by 167
  15. 2025WorldScore: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for World Generationcited by 143
  16. 2025VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generationcited by 141
  17. 2024OMG-LLaVA: Bridging Image-level, Object-level, Pixel-level Reasoning and Understandingcited by 126
  18. 2024VidProM: A Million-scale Real Prompt-Gallery Dataset for Text-to-Video Diffusion Modelscited by 124
  19. 2024Is Sora a World Simulator? A Comprehensive Survey on General World Models and Beyondcited by 111
  20. 2024MAVIS: Mathematical Visual Instruction Tuning with an Automatic Data Enginecited by 111
  21. 2025VideoREPA: Learning Physics for Video Generation through Relational Alignment with Foundation Modelscited by 88
  22. 2025WISA: World Simulator Assistant for Physics-Aware Text-to-Video Generationcited by 87
  23. 2024Pandora: Towards General World Model with Natural Language Actions and Video Statescited by 83
  24. 2024PhyT2V: LLM-Guided Iterative Self-Refinement for Physics-Grounded Text-to-Video Generationcited by 77
  25. 2025Vid2World: Crafting Video Diffusion Models to Interactive World Modelscited by 67
  26. 2025TIIF-Bench: How Does Your T2I Model Follow Your Instructions?cited by 64
  27. 2024VidGen-1M: A Large-Scale Dataset for Text-to-video Generationcited by 60
  28. 2024Sora as a World Model? A Complete Survey on Text-to-Video Generationcited by 53
  29. 2024LiFT: Leveraging Human Feedback for Text-to-Video Model Alignmentcited by 51
  30. 2025Captain Cinema: Towards Short Movie Generationcited by 48
  31. 2025VLM-R3: Region Recognition, Reasoning, and Refinement for Enhanced Multimodal Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 47
  32. 2024Sora Generates Videos with Stunning Geometrical Consistencycited by 31
  33. 2025T2VWorldBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating World Knowledge in Text-to-Video Generationcited by 18
  34. 2024Is this Generated Person Existed in Real-world? Fine-grained Detecting and Calibrating Abnormal Human-bodycited by 12
  35. 2023Towards Top-Down Reasoning: An Explainable Multi-Agent Approach for Visual Question Answeringcited by 11
  36. 2025TimeCausality: Evaluating the Causal Ability in Time Dimension for Vision Language Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025TRAVL: A Recipe for Making Video-Language Models Better Judges of Physics Implausibility
  2. 2025PhysVidBench: Language-Grounded Evaluation of Physical Commonsense in Text-to-Video Models
  3. 2025"PhyWorldBench": A Comprehensive Evaluation of Physical Realism in Text-to-Video Models
  4. 2025Spotlight: Identifying and Localizing Video Generation Errors Using VLMs
  5. 2026Each Judge Its Own Yardstick: Discovering Per-VLM Taxonomies for Physical Video Evaluation
  6. 2025VideoVerse: Does Your T2V Generator Have World Model Capability to Synthesize Videos?
  7. 2026Physion-Eval: Evaluating Physical Realism in Generated Video via Human Reasoning
  8. 2026BRITE: A Benchmark for Reliable and Interpretable T2V Evaluation on Implausible Scenarios