mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PhyMetric: Diagnosing Physical Plausibility in Text-to-Video Generation via Scene-Level QA

arXiv 2610.19823 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-video (T2V) generation models can produce visually realistic videos that nevertheless violate the physical consequences implied by the prompt and scene. Existing benchmarks largely rely on holistic plausibility scores or broad quality dimensions, leaving it unclear which physical behavior is being tested and why a model fails. We introduce PhyMetric, a scene-level diagnostic benchmark that recasts physical plausibility evaluation as verifiable, scene-grounded question answering. PhyMetric contains 1{,}115 scenes spanning 50 physical categories across six domains, paired with 8{,}920 answer-balanced binary questions over 12 evaluation dimensions. Each scene is associated with eight targeted yes/no questions and a structured physical prior specifying the governing law, expected temporal sequence, observable signatures, and common failure modes. At evaluation time, a vision-language model (VLM) judge answers each question from question-aware sampled frames conditioned on the prior, and correctness is hierarchically aggregated into scene, dimension, physical category, and model scores. Experiments on four open-source T2V models and three VLM judges show that scene-specific binary QA is a critical component of the protocol: when each targeted question is replaced by a single generic plausibility query, evaluator accuracy drops to the chance level. Structured physical priors offer a complementary signal that improves human alignment of the resulting scores, with effects that vary across VLM judges of different capacity. These findings establish PhyMetric as a benchmark that turns physical plausibility evaluation from opaque holistic scoring into interpretable, scene-level inspection. Our project page is available at: https://mengsiwei.github.io/PhyMetric/.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.

Builds on

32 of 42 references.

References · 32

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  3. 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,708
  4. 2024CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformercited by 2,261
  5. 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
  6. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  7. 2024WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulatorscited by 881
  8. 2025Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AIcited by 864
  9. 2024Genie: Generative Interactive Environmentscited by 747
  10. 2023InternVid: A Large-scale Video-Text Dataset for Multimodal Understanding and Generationcited by 497
  11. 2023EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Modelscited by 340
  12. 2025VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulnesscited by 315
20 more
  1. 2024VideoPhy: Evaluating Physical Commonsense for Video Generationcited by 228
  2. 2024How Far is Video Generation from World Model: A Physical Law Perspectivecited by 212
  3. 2024T2V-CompBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-video Generationcited by 185
  4. 2024Towards World Simulator: Crafting Physical Commonsense-Based Benchmark for Video Generationcited by 174
  5. 2025PhysBench: Benchmarking and Enhancing Vision-Language Models for Physical World Understandingcited by 160
  6. 2026Seedance 2.0: Advancing Video Generation for World Complexitycited by 160
  7. 2025WorldScore: A Unified Evaluation Benchmark for World Generationcited by 156
  8. 2025VideoPhy-2: A Challenging Action-Centric Physical Commonsense Evaluation in Video Generationcited by 149
  9. 2023FETV: A Benchmark for Fine-Grained Evaluation of Open-Domain Text-to-Video Generationcited by 122
  10. 2024ChronoMagic-Bench: A Benchmark for Metamorphic Evaluation of Text-to-Time-lapse Video Generationcited by 75
  11. 2025Video-Bench: Human-Aligned Video Generation Benchmarkcited by 57
  12. 2025T2VWorldBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating World Knowledge in Text-to-Video Generationcited by 19
  13. 2025TRAVL: A Recipe for Making Video-Language Models Better Judges of Physics Implausibilitycited by 18
  14. 2025LikePhys: Evaluating Intuitive Physics Understanding in Video Diffusion Models via Likelihood Preferencecited by 16
  15. 2026Physion-Eval: Evaluating Physical Realism in Generated Video via Human Reasoningcited by 14
  16. 2025Grounding Creativity in Physics: A Brief Survey of Physical Priors in AIGCcited by 12
  17. 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Modelscited by 10
  18. 2025ETVA: Evaluation of Text-to-Video Alignment via Fine-grained Question Generation and Answeringcited by 9
  19. 2025PhyMAGIC: Physical Motion-Aware Generative Inference with Confidence-guided LLMcited by 5
  20. 2026When Physical Preferences Meet Semantic Constraints: Physical and Semantic Direct Preference Optimization for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Physics Question Scene Graph: Fine-grained Evaluation of Physical Plausibility in Text-to-Video Generation
  2. 2025PhysVidBench: Language-Grounded Evaluation of Physical Commonsense in Text-to-Video Models
  3. 2025PhyDetEx: Detecting and Explaining the Physical Plausibility of T2V Models
  4. 2025CausalVQA: A Physically Grounded Causal Reasoning Benchmark for Video Models
  5. 2024Q-Bench-Video: Benchmarking the Video Quality Understanding of LMMs
  6. 2026PhysMRV: Physical Memory Retrieval and Verification for Physics Plausibility Reasoning
  7. 2025A Shortcut-aware Video-QA Benchmark for Physical Understanding via Minimal Video Pairs
  8. 2026CinematicVQA: Benchmarking Film-Grammar Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models