mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TD-JEPA: Latent-predictive Representations for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2510.00739 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Latent prediction--where agents learn by predicting their own latents--has emerged as a powerful paradigm for training general representations in machine learning. In reinforcement learning (RL), this approach has been explored to define auxiliary losses for a variety of settings, including reward-based and unsupervised RL, behavior cloning, and world modeling. While existing methods are typically limited to single-task learning, one-step prediction, or on-policy trajectory data, we show that temporal difference (TD) learning enables learning representations predictive of long-term latent dynamics across multiple policies from offline, reward-free transitions. Building on this, we introduce TD-JEPA, which leverages TD-based latent-predictive representations into unsupervised RL. TD-JEPA trains explicit state and task encoders, a policy-conditioned multi-step predictor, and a set of parameterized policies directly in latent space. This enables zero-shot optimization of any reward function at test time. Theoretically, we show that an idealized variant of TD-JEPA avoids collapse with proper initialization, and learns encoders that capture a low-rank factorization of long-term policy dynamics, while the predictor recovers their successor features in latent space. Empirically, TD-JEPA matches or outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on locomotion, navigation, and manipulation tasks across 13 datasets in ExoRL and OGBench, especially in the challenging setting of zero-shot RL from pixels.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

57 of 71 references.

References · 57

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  3. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  4. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  5. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  6. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
  7. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  8. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  9. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
  10. 2018IMPALA: Scalable Distributed Deep-RL with Importance Weighted Actor-Learner Architecturescited by 866
  11. 2024DROID: A Large-Scale In-The-Wild Robot Manipulation Datasetcited by 801
  12. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
38 more
  1. 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 738
  2. 2022R3M: A Universal Visual Representation for Robot Manipulationcited by 678
  3. 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 482
  4. 2022VIP: Towards Universal Visual Reward and Representation via Value-Implicit Pre-Trainingcited by 384
  5. 2021Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 359
  6. 2024DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planningcited by 357
  7. 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
  8. 2020Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive Representationscited by 309
  9. 2024Latent Action Pretraining from Videoscited by 302
  10. 2015Embed to Control: A Locally Linear Latent Dynamics Model for Control from Raw Imagescited by 266
  11. 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 216
  12. 2023Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?cited by 215
  13. 2019DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learningcited by 204
  14. 2025Flow Q-Learningcited by 162
  15. 2022The Unsurprising Effectiveness of Pre-Trained Vision Models for Controlcited by 155
  16. 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 110
  17. 2025ASAP: Aligning Simulation and Real-World Physics for Learning Agile Humanoid Whole-Body Skillscited by 104
  18. 2020Bootstrap Latent-Predictive Representations for Multitask Reinforcement Learningcited by 101
  19. 2022Don't Change the Algorithm, Change the Data: Exploratory Data for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
  20. 2024Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representationscited by 89
  21. 2018The Laplacian in RL: Learning Representations with Efficient Approximationscited by 83
  22. 2022Does Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Exist?cited by 79
  23. 2025Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Modelscited by 77
  24. 2022BYOL-Explore: Exploration by Bootstrapped Predictioncited by 71
  25. 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 67
  26. 2023Reinforcement Learning from Passive Data via Latent Intentionscited by 64
  27. 2025Zero-Shot Whole-Body Humanoid Control via Behavioral Foundation Modelscited by 51
  28. 2022Understanding Self-Predictive Learning for Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  29. 2024Towards Generalist Robot Learning from Internet Video: A Surveycited by 40
  30. 2025Towards General-Purpose Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  31. 2025HDMI: Learning Interactive Humanoid Whole-Body Control from Human Videoscited by 32
  32. 2023Robotic Offline RL from Internet Videos via Value-Function Pre-Trainingcited by 31
  33. 2023Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning from Low Quality Datacited by 21
  34. 2025Fast Adaptation with Behavioral Foundation Modelscited by 20
  35. 2024Proto Successor Measure: Representing the Behavior Space of an RL Agentcited by 17
  36. 2025Behavior Foundation Model for Humanoid Robotscited by 15
  37. 2024When does Self-Prediction help? Understanding Auxiliary Tasks in Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  38. 2023Bootstrapped Representations in Reinforcement Learningcited by 11

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 17.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MA-JEPA: Joint-Embedding World Models for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2023Reasoning with Latent Diffusion in Offline Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2026D-JEPA: A Decision-Aligned Latent World Model
  4. 2026JEPA-x: Cross-Predictive Physics Grounding for Forecastable Latent Dynamics
  5. 2026JEPA-TTT: Persistent Test-Time Training of Latent World Models for Planning under Dynamics Shifts
  6. 2026Towards Zero-Shot Task Transfer with Neurosymbolic World Models
  7. 2025ACT-JEPA: Novel Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture for Efficient Policy Representation Learning
  8. 2026Temporal-Distance JEPA: Plan-Aware Representation Learning for Latent World Model Predictive Control