mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Three Steps at a Time: Learning Representations from Action Sequences in Contrastive RL

arXiv 2608.30640 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While self-supervised approaches to reinforcement learning have achieved strong results by learning representations of states and actions, a key open question is the time scale over which actions should be modeled. Departing from the standard formulation relying on single-step actions, we extend contrastive reinforcement learning (CRL), a prototypical self-supervised method, to operate over action chunks, and find that this results in large, pervasive gains across established offline and online benchmarks: +31.7% and +93.1% across 18 and 11 environments respectively. While action-chunking-driven gains are generally explained through the ability to model non-Markovian, temporally extended policies, and to propagate unbiased multi-step returns, interestingly, we find that these arguments only partially apply to CRL. Our empirical studies suggest that, in the context of CRL, an action chunk carries more information about the goal than a single action, measurably improving the critic's representations, and rendering the algorithm significantly more effective.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

42 of 54 references.

References · 42

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  6. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  7. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
  8. 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
  9. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  10. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 781
  11. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  12. 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 424
30 more
  1. 2018Visual Reinforcement Learning with Imagined Goalscited by 248
  2. 2022Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 241
  3. 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixelscited by 237
  4. 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 216
  5. 2019DeepMDP: Learning Continuous Latent Space Models for Representation Learningcited by 204
  6. 2025Real-Time Execution of Action Chunking Flow Policiescited by 199
  7. 2018Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradientscited by 195
  8. 2015Learning Continuous Control Policies by Stochastic Value Gradientscited by 156
  9. 2023Optimal Goal-Reaching Reinforcement Learning via Quasimetric Learningcited by 116
  10. 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 110
  11. 2017Grounded Language Learning in a Simulated 3D Worldcited by 100
  12. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action Chunkingcited by 97
  13. 2018Learning to Understand Goal Specifications by Modelling Rewardcited by 80
  14. 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 67
  15. 2025Training-Time Action Conditioning for Efficient Real-Time Chunkingcited by 61
  16. 2018Learning Actionable Representations with Goal-Conditioned Policiescited by 53
  17. 2024Learning Temporal Distances: Contrastive Successor Features Can Provide a Metric Structure for Decision-Makingcited by 53
  18. 2024Bidirectional Decoding: Improving Action Chunking via Guided Test-Time Samplingcited by 46
  19. 20251000 Layer Networks for Self-Supervised RL: Scaling Depth Can Enable New Goal-Reaching Capabilitiescited by 39
  20. 2022Bisimulation Makes Analogies in Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 38
  21. 2024A Single Goal is All You Need: Skills and Exploration Emerge from Contrastive RL without Rewards, Demonstrations, or Subgoalscited by 20
  22. 2023Stabilizing Contrastive RL: Techniques for Robotic Goal Reaching from Offline Datacited by 19
  23. 2025Decoupled Q-Chunkingcited by 18
  24. 2025TD-JEPA: Latent-predictive Representations for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  25. 2025Action Chunking and Exploratory Data Collection Yield Exponential Improvements in Behavior Cloning for Continuous Controlcited by 15
  26. 2025Temporal Representation Alignment: Successor Features Enable Emergent Compositionality in Robot Instruction Followingcited by 13
  27. 2022State Representation Learning for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  28. 2025Self-Predictive Representations for Combinatorial Generalization in Behavioral Cloningcited by 9
  29. 2026Adaptive Action Chunking via Multi-Chunk Q Value Estimationcited by 4
  30. 2025Demystifying the Mechanisms Behind Emergent Exploration in Goal-conditioned RLcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.