mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning from Reward-Free Offline Data: A Case for Planning with Latent Dynamics Models

arXiv 2502.14819 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2025cs.LGcited by 77

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 60 in World models, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

A long-standing goal in AI is to develop agents capable of solving diverse tasks across a range of environments, including those never seen during training. Two dominant paradigms address this challenge: (i) reinforcement learning (RL), which learns policies via trial and error, and (ii) optimal control, which plans actions using a known or learned dynamics model. However, their comparative strengths in the offline setting - where agents must learn from reward-free trajectories - remain underexplored. In this work, we systematically evaluate RL and control-based methods on a suite of navigation tasks, using offline datasets of varying quality. On the RL side, we consider goal-conditioned and zero-shot methods. On the control side, we train a latent dynamics model using the Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) and employ it for planning. We investigate how factors such as data diversity, trajectory quality, and environment variability influence the performance of these approaches. Our results show that model-free RL benefits most from large amounts of high-quality data, whereas model-based planning generalizes better to unseen layouts and is more data-efficient, while achieving trajectory stitching performance comparable to leading model-free methods. Notably, planning with a latent dynamics model proves to be a strong approach for handling suboptimal offline data and adapting to diverse environments.

Key facts. Cited by 77 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.

Builds on

63 of 88 references.

References · 63

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  5. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  6. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  7. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  8. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  9. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,427
  10. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  11. 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
  12. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
38 more
  1. 2018Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixelscited by 1,221
  2. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
  3. 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
  4. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
  5. 2024DROID: A Large-Scale In-The-Wild Robot Manipulation Datasetcited by 801
  6. 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 745
  7. 2022R3M: A Universal Visual Representation for Robot Manipulationcited by 678
  8. 2020MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy Optimizationcited by 630
  9. 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 482
  10. 2022Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive Controlcited by 375
  11. 2024DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planningcited by 357
  12. 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
  13. 2019Learning Latent Plans from Playcited by 310
  14. 2016Deep Visual Foresight for Planning Robot Motioncited by 276
  15. 2019RoboNet: Large-Scale Multi-Robot Learningcited by 268
  16. 2015Embed to Control: A Locally Linear Latent Dynamics Model for Control from Raw Imagescited by 266
  17. 2022Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 241
  18. 2018Visual Foresight: Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Controlcited by 220
  19. 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 216
  20. 2023Foundation Models for Decision Making: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 160
  21. 2015Deep Spatial Autoencoders for Visuomotor Learningcited by 149
  22. 2023A Survey of Imitation Learning: Algorithms, Recent Developments, and Challengescited by 145
  23. 2023HIQL: Offline Goal-Conditioned RL with Latent States as Actionscited by 133
  24. 2018State Representation Learning for Control: An Overviewcited by 125
  25. 2015Model Predictive Path Integral Control using Covariance Variable Importance Samplingcited by 122
  26. 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 110
  27. 2021Pretraining Representations for Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learningcited by 105
  28. 2020The Importance of Pessimism in Fixed-Dataset Policy Optimizationcited by 99
  29. 2022Don't Change the Algorithm, Change the Data: Exploratory Data for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
  30. 2024Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representationscited by 89
  31. 2018The Laplacian in RL: Learning Representations with Efficient Approximationscited by 83
  32. 2022Does Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Exist?cited by 79
  33. 2022How to Leverage Unlabeled Data in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 61
  34. 2020Long-Horizon Visual Planning with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Predictorscited by 60
  35. 2024Learning by Reconstruction Produces Uninformative Features For Perceptioncited by 54
  36. 2022Investigating Compounding Prediction Errors in Learned Dynamics Modelscited by 47
  37. 2020Goal-Aware Prediction: Learning to Model What Matterscited by 45
  38. 2017Robust Locally-Linear Controllable Embeddingcited by 37

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 17; 2026: 60.

77 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 738
  2. 2025Embodied AI Agents: Modeling the Worldcited by 57
  3. 2025Back to the Features: DINO as a Foundation for Video World Modelscited by 56
  4. 2025What Drives Success in Physical Planning with Joint-Embedding Predictive World Models?cited by 37
  5. 2025Planning with Reasoning using Vision Language World Modelcited by 36
  6. 2026Hierarchical Planning with Latent World Modelscited by 34
  7. 2026Temporal Straightening for Latent Planningcited by 32
  8. 2025Critique of World Modelcited by 24
  9. 2025Value-guided action planning with JEPA world modelscited by 19
  10. 2025TD-JEPA: Latent-predictive Representations for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  11. 2026Predictive but Not Plannable: RC-aux for Latent World Modelscited by 16
  12. 2026AdaJEPA: An Adaptive Latent World Modelcited by 16
38 more
  1. 2026Sensorimotor World Models: Perception for Action via Inverse Dynamicscited by 14
  2. 2026stable-worldmodel: A Platform for Reproducible World Modeling Research and Evaluationcited by 13
  3. 2025Graph-Assisted Stitching for Offline Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  4. 2026Fast LeWorldModelcited by 12
  5. 2026Learning Invariant Visual Representations for Planning with Joint-Embedding Predictive World Modelscited by 11
  6. 2026Delta-JEPA: Learning Action-Sensitive World Models via Latent Difference Decodingcited by 11
  7. 2025Self-Predictive Representations for Combinatorial Generalization in Behavioral Cloningcited by 9
  8. 2026SkyJEPA: Learning Long-Horizon World Models for Zero-Shot Sim-to-Real Control of Quadrotorscited by 9
  9. 2025Test-Time Graph Search for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  10. 2025seq-JEPA: Autoregressive Predictive Learning of Invariant-Equivariant World Modelscited by 7
  11. 2025STORM: Search-Guided Generative World Models for Robotic Manipulationcited by 7
  12. 2026DiLA: Disentangled Latent Action World Modelscited by 6
  13. 2025Why and How Auxiliary Tasks Improve JEPA Representationscited by 5
  14. 2026SAGE: Subgoal-Conditioned Action Generation for Latent World Model Planningcited by 5
  15. 2026QQWorld: Quantile-Quantile Matching for World Model Regularizationcited by 5
  16. 2026LpWM: A Case for Sparse Representations in World Modelscited by 5
  17. 2026Self-Supervised JEPA-based World Models for LiDAR Occupancy Completion and Forecastingcited by 4
  18. 2026Radial-VCReg: More Informative Representation Learning Through Radial Gaussianizationcited by 4
  19. 2026ACID: Action Consistency via Inverse Dynamics for Planning with World Modelscited by 4
  20. 2026Temporally Centered SIGReg Improves LeWorldModel Representations for Robot Policy Learningcited by 4
  21. 2026PhyLatent: Learning Dynamics-Relevant Representations for JEPA World Modelscited by 4
  22. 2026SCALE: State-Calibrated Latent Embeddings for JEPA Planning in the Right Geometrycited by 4
  23. 2026No Gaussian Required: Contrastive Inverse Dynamics for JEPA World Modelscited by 4
  24. 2025Extremum Flow Matching for Offline Goal Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  25. 2026ATM: Action-Consistency Transfer Matrix for Diagnosing and Improving Latent World Modelscited by 3
  26. 2026Explorative Modeling: Unlocking a Third Pretraining Axis and End-to-End Generationcited by 3
  27. 2026Dreamer-CDP: Improving Reconstruction-free World Models Via Continuous Deterministic Representation Predictioncited by 2
  28. 2026Reward Prediction with Factorized World Statescited by 2
  29. 2026Structured Latent Dynamics in Wireless CSI via Homomorphic World Modelscited by 2
  30. 2026Unifying Object-Centric World Models and Diffusion Policy: A Hierarchical Framework for Multi-Stage Robotic Taskscited by 2
  31. 2026Pixels to Proofs: Probabilistically-Safe Latent World Model Control via Parallel Conformal Robust MPCcited by 2
  32. 2026The SIGReg Objective as Variational Free Energy: A Theoretical Active-Inference Account of JEPA World Modelscited by 2
  33. 2026Depth-Regularized JEPA World Models Learn More Transferable Representations from Real Outdoor Robot Datacited by 2
  34. 2026Diagnosing JEPA World Models with Action-Conditioned Predictive Consistencycited by 2
  35. 2026Reinforced Planning with Latent World Modelscited by 2
  36. 2026Self-Supervised Learning from Structural Invariancecited by 1
  37. 2026Grounded World Model for Semantically Generalizable Planningcited by 1
  38. 2026Latent Goal Prediction from Language for Model-Based Planningcited by 1

50 most cited of 77 All 77 (JSON)