The Laplacian Keyboard: Beyond the Linear Span
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Across scientific disciplines, Laplacian eigenvectors serve as a fundamental basis for simplifying complex systems, from signal processing to quantum mechanics. In reinforcement learning (RL), they similarly form a basis over the state space, enabling reward functions to be approximated by projection onto a small set of eigenvectors. This projection makes zero-shot control possible, but it also imposes a fundamental limitation: the induced policies are only as expressive as the linear span of the chosen eigenvectors. We introduce the Laplacian Keyboard (LK), a hierarchical framework that goes beyond this linear span. LK constructs a task-agnostic library of behaviors from these eigenvectors, forming a behavior basis guaranteed to contain the optimal policy for any reward within the linear span. A meta-policy learns to stitch these behaviors dynamically, enabling efficient learning of policies outside the original linear constraints. We establish theoretical bounds on zero-shot approximation error and demonstrate empirically that LK improves over the zero-shot solution while achieving better sample efficiency compared to standard RL methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 41 references.
References · 28
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
- 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
- 2017A Laplacian Framework for Option Discovery in Reinforcement Learningcited by 108
- 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 102
- 2022Don't Change the Algorithm, Change the Data: Exploratory Data for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
- 2024Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representationscited by 89
- 2022Does Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Exist?cited by 79
- 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 67
- 2021The Option Keyboard: Combining Skills in Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2019A Geometric Perspective on Optimal Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
16 more
- 2021Temporal Abstraction in Reinforcement Learning with the Successor Representationcited by 52
- 2025Zero-Shot Whole-Body Humanoid Control via Behavioral Foundation Modelscited by 51
- 2023Proto-Value Networks: Scaling Representation Learning with Auxiliary Taskscited by 41
- 2019Discovering Options for Exploration by Minimizing Cover Timecited by 30
- 2023Deep Laplacian-based Options for Temporally-Extended Explorationcited by 28
- 2013Vertex-Frequency Analysis on Graphscited by 24
- 2021Discovering a set of policies for the worst case rewardcited by 21
- 2025Fast Adaptation with Behavioral Foundation Modelscited by 20
- 2024Proto Successor Measure: Representing the Behavior Space of an RL Agentcited by 17
- 2025TD-JEPA: Latent-predictive Representations for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2021Constructing a Good Behavior Basis for Transfer using Generalized Policy Updatescited by 14
- 2023Combining Behaviors with the Successor Features Keyboardcited by 12
- 2023Proper Laplacian Representation Learningcited by 9
- 2025Optimistic Task Inference for Behavior Foundation Modelscited by 5
- 2025Constructing an Optimal Behavior Basis for the Option Keyboardcited by 2
- 2025Which Features are Best for Successor Features?cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.