mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Laplacian Keyboard: Beyond the Linear Span

arXiv 2602.07730 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Across scientific disciplines, Laplacian eigenvectors serve as a fundamental basis for simplifying complex systems, from signal processing to quantum mechanics. In reinforcement learning (RL), they similarly form a basis over the state space, enabling reward functions to be approximated by projection onto a small set of eigenvectors. This projection makes zero-shot control possible, but it also imposes a fundamental limitation: the induced policies are only as expressive as the linear span of the chosen eigenvectors. We introduce the Laplacian Keyboard (LK), a hierarchical framework that goes beyond this linear span. LK constructs a task-agnostic library of behaviors from these eigenvectors, forming a behavior basis guaranteed to contain the optimal policy for any reward within the linear span. A meta-policy learns to stitch these behaviors dynamically, enabling efficient learning of policies outside the original linear constraints. We establish theoretical bounds on zero-shot approximation error and demonstrate empirically that LK improves over the zero-shot solution while achieving better sample efficiency compared to standard RL methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.

Builds on

28 of 41 references.

References · 28

  1. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  2. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  3. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  4. 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
  5. 2017A Laplacian Framework for Option Discovery in Reinforcement Learningcited by 108
  6. 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 102
  7. 2022Don't Change the Algorithm, Change the Data: Exploratory Data for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
  8. 2024Foundation Policies with Hilbert Representationscited by 89
  9. 2022Does Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning Exist?cited by 79
  10. 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 67
  11. 2021The Option Keyboard: Combining Skills in Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  12. 2019A Geometric Perspective on Optimal Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 54
16 more
  1. 2021Temporal Abstraction in Reinforcement Learning with the Successor Representationcited by 52
  2. 2025Zero-Shot Whole-Body Humanoid Control via Behavioral Foundation Modelscited by 51
  3. 2023Proto-Value Networks: Scaling Representation Learning with Auxiliary Taskscited by 41
  4. 2019Discovering Options for Exploration by Minimizing Cover Timecited by 30
  5. 2023Deep Laplacian-based Options for Temporally-Extended Explorationcited by 28
  6. 2013Vertex-Frequency Analysis on Graphscited by 24
  7. 2021Discovering a set of policies for the worst case rewardcited by 21
  8. 2025Fast Adaptation with Behavioral Foundation Modelscited by 20
  9. 2024Proto Successor Measure: Representing the Behavior Space of an RL Agentcited by 17
  10. 2025TD-JEPA: Latent-predictive Representations for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  11. 2021Constructing a Good Behavior Basis for Transfer using Generalized Policy Updatescited by 14
  12. 2023Combining Behaviors with the Successor Features Keyboardcited by 12
  13. 2023Proper Laplacian Representation Learningcited by 9
  14. 2025Optimistic Task Inference for Behavior Foundation Modelscited by 5
  15. 2025Constructing an Optimal Behavior Basis for the Option Keyboardcited by 2
  16. 2025Which Features are Best for Successor Features?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.