mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Democratizing Diplomacy: A Harness for Evaluating Any Large Language Model on Full-Press Diplomacy

arXiv 2508.07485 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2025cs.AI cs.CL cs.CYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present the first evaluation harness that enables any out-of-the-box, local, Large Language Models (LLMs) to play full-press Diplomacy without fine-tuning or specialized training. Previous work required frontier LLMs, or fine-tuning, due to the high complexity and information density of Diplomacy's game state. Combined with the high variance of matches, these factors made Diplomacy prohibitive for study. In this work, we used data-driven iteration to optimize a textual game state representation such that a 24B model can reliably complete matches without any fine tuning. We develop tooling to facilitate hypothesis testing and statistical analysis, and we present case studies on persuasion, aggressive playstyles, and performance across a range of models. We conduct a variety of experiments across many popular LLMs, finding the larger models perform the best, but the smaller models still play adequately. We also introduce Critical State Analysis: an experimental protocol for rapidly iterating and analyzing key moments in a game at depth. Our harness democratizes the evaluation of strategic reasoning in LLMs by eliminating the need for fine-tuning, and it provides insights into how these capabilities emerge naturally from widely used LLMs. Our code is available in the supplement and will be open sourced.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2025.

Builds on

11 of 40 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  3. 2024GTBench: Uncovering the Strategic Reasoning Limitations of LLMs via Game-Theoretic Evaluationscited by 120
  4. 2024GameBench: Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLM Agentscited by 95
  5. 2023Strategic Behavior of Large Language Models: Game Structure vs. Contextual Framingcited by 51
  6. 2018Establishing Appropriate Trust via Critical Statescited by 48
  7. 2024Richelieu: Self-Evolving LLM-Based Agents for AI Diplomacycited by 36
  8. 2025Agents of Change: Self-Evolving LLM Agents for Strategic Planningcited by 21
  9. 2024More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Playcited by 9
  10. 2025The Thin Line Between Comprehension and Persuasion in LLMscited by 5
  11. 2025DipLLM: Fine-Tuning LLM for Strategic Decision-making in Diplomacycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Age of LLM: A Strategic 1v1 Benchmark for Reasoning, Diplomacy and Reliability of Large Language Models under Fog of War
  2. 2025Measuring Fine-Grained Negotiation Tactics of Humans and LLMs in Diplomacy
  3. 2026GENSTRAT: Toward a Science of Strategic Reasoning in Large Language Models
  4. 2026Multi-Agent Strategic Games with LLMs
  5. 2023Welfare Diplomacy: Benchmarking Language Model Cooperation
  6. 2026Choosing LLMs for Strategic Agent Interactions
  7. 2025Towards Strategic Persuasion with Language Models
  8. 2025Tracking World States with Language Models: State-Based Evaluation Using Chess