Calibrated Value-Aware Model Learning with Probabilistic Environment Models
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
The idea of value-aware model learning, that models should produce accurate value estimates, has gained prominence in model-based reinforcement learning. The MuZero loss, which penalizes a model's value function prediction compared to the ground-truth value function, has been utilized in several prominent empirical works in the literature. However, theoretical investigation into its strengths and weaknesses is limited. In this paper, we analyze the family of value-aware model learning losses, which includes the popular MuZero loss. We show that these losses, as normally used, are uncalibrated surrogate losses, which means that they do not always recover the correct model and value function. Building on this insight, we propose corrections to solve this issue. Furthermore, we investigate the interplay between the loss calibration, latent model architectures, and auxiliary losses that are commonly employed when training MuZero-style agents. We show that while deterministic models can be sufficient to predict accurate values, learning calibrated stochastic models is still advantageous.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 41 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.
Builds on
41 of 62 references.
References · 41
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,353
- 2020Mastering Atari with Discrete World Modelscited by 1,007
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 774
- 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
- 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 512
- 2022Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive Controlcited by 397
- 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 375
29 more
- 2021Mastering Atari Games with Limited Datacited by 237
- 2020Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Value-Targeted Regressioncited by 234
- 2018Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Stochastic Ensemble Value Expansioncited by 168
- 2022Understanding and Preventing Capacity Loss in Reinforcement Learningcited by 125
- 2017Value Prediction Networkcited by 117
- 2024Bigger, Regularized, Optimistic: scaling for compute and sample-efficient continuous controlcited by 108
- 2019Sample Complexity of Reinforcement Learning using Linearly Combined Model Ensemblescited by 100
- 2020The Value Equivalence Principle for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 94
- 2016The Predictron: End-To-End Learning and Planningcited by 93
- 2022BYOL-Explore: Exploration by Bootstrapped Predictioncited by 73
- 2023Empirical Design in Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
- 2024Bridging State and History Representations: Understanding Self-Predictive RLcited by 54
- 2022Understanding Self-Predictive Learning for Reinforcement Learningcited by 44
- 2016Self-Correcting Models for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 43
- 2025Towards General-Purpose Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 41
- 2021Mismatched No More: Joint Model-Policy Optimization for Model-Based RLcited by 36
- 2023Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Requires Regulating Overfittingcited by 36
- 2021Control-Oriented Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Differentiationcited by 35
- 2021Proper Value Equivalencecited by 33
- 2022Value Gradient weighted Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
- 2020Selective Dyna-style Planning Under Limited Model Capacitycited by 30
- 2022Simplifying Model-based RL: Learning Representations, Latent-space Models, and Policies with One Objectivecited by 28
- 2020Policy-Aware Model Learning for Policy Gradient Methodscited by 23
- 2019Gradient-Aware Model-based Policy Searchcited by 19
- 2024MAD-TD: Model-Augmented Data stabilizes High Update Ratio RLcited by 16
- 2024When does Self-Prediction help? Understanding Auxiliary Tasks in Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
- 2019Planning with Expectation Modelscited by 12
- 2022Operator Splitting Value Iterationcited by 8
- 2023Maximum Entropy Model Correction in Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024A Note on Loss Functions and Error Compounding in Model-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Inverting the Bellman Equation: From Q-Values to World Models
- 2026Robo-ValueRL: Reliable Value Estimation for Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning
- 2024On the Limited Representational Power of Value Functions and its Links to Statistical (In)Efficiency
- 2025Rectifying Regression in Reinforcement Learning
- 2024A Multi-step Loss Function for Robust Learning of the Dynamics in Model-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Operator-on-F complements value-equivalence: a planning-time diagnostic for latent world models
- 2026A Pontryagin Method of Model-based Reinforcement Learning via Hamiltonian Actor-Critic