mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Multi-step Loss Function for Robust Learning of the Dynamics in Model-based Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2402.03146 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In model-based reinforcement learning, most algorithms rely on simulating trajectories from one-step models of the dynamics learned on data. A critical challenge of this approach is the compounding of one-step prediction errors as the length of the trajectory grows. In this paper we tackle this issue by using a multi-step objective to train one-step models. Our objective is a weighted sum of the mean squared error (MSE) loss at various future horizons. We find that this new loss is particularly useful when the data is noisy (additive Gaussian noise in the observations), which is often the case in real-life environments. To support the multi-step loss, first we study its properties in two tractable cases: i) uni-dimensional linear system, and ii) two-parameter non-linear system. Second, we show in a variety of tasks (environments or datasets) that the models learned with this loss achieve a significant improvement in terms of the averaged R2-score on future prediction horizons. Finally, in the pure batch reinforcement learning setting, we demonstrate that one-step models serve as strong baselines when dynamics are deterministic, while multi-step models would be more advantageous in the presence of noise, highlighting the potential of our approach in real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

Builds on

20 of 50 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
  4. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  5. 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 753
  6. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 748
  7. 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 723
  8. 2017Neural Network Dynamics for Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Model-Free Fine-Tuningcited by 288
  9. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 235
  10. 2016Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networkscited by 214
  11. 2017Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Attackscited by 152
  12. 2015How (not) to Train your Generative Model: Scheduled Sampling, Likelihood, Adversary?cited by 76
8 more
  1. 2023Generalized Teacher Forcing for Learning Chaotic Dynamicscited by 55
  2. 2022Investigating Compounding Prediction Errors in Learned Dynamics Modelscited by 47
  3. 2016Self-Correcting Models for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  4. 2021Evaluation of deep learning models for multi-step ahead time series predictioncited by 25
  5. 2021Learning Dynamics Models for Model Predictive Agentscited by 21
  6. 2021Evaluating model-based planning and planner amortization for continuous controlcited by 15
  7. 2021Model-based micro-data reinforcement learning: what are the crucial model properties and which model to choose?cited by 11
  8. 2021Exploring the Training Robustness of Distributional Reinforcement Learning against Noisy State Observationscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Learning with Imperfect Models: When Multi-step Prediction Mitigates Compounding Error
  2. 2023Multi-timestep models for Model-based Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2024Any-step Dynamics Model Improves Future Predictions for Online and Offline Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2024Switching the Loss Reduces the Cost in Batch (Offline) Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2025One-Step Generative Policies with Q-Learning: A Reformulation of MeanFlow
  6. 2021Continuous Doubly Constrained Batch Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2023Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Local Misspecification
  8. 2026On Training in Imagination