Inverting the Bellman Equation: From Q-Values to World Models
On the map: World models → Latent dynamics models and model-based RL
Abstract (arXiv)
Model-based and model-free reinforcement learning are traditionally viewed as separate paradigms: instead of learning a model of the transition kernel P, model-free agents typically estimate value functions tied to a specific policy and reward. In this paper, we challenge this dichotomy by proving that value-based agents trained on a sufficiently rich set of reward functions, e.g. using goal-conditioned RL, implicitly encode a unique and accurate world model. To extract this model in practice, we introduce textitP-learning, an inverse analogue to Q-learning that samples from an agent's Q-values, policies and rewards to decode its internal model of the environment. We then provide sufficient conditions on the type and number of goals for which agents encode the true kernel P, covering both stochastic and deterministic MDPs over finite or continuous state spaces. Even when our assumptions are violated, we empirically demonstrate that agents trained on a handful of reward functions encode accurate dynamics in textttReacher, textttMountainCar and stochastic variants of textttFourRooms. Surprisingly, we find that policies trained exclusively on a textttReacher agent's implicit world model are quasi-optimal on out-of-distribution, velocity-based goals despite position-only training -- suggesting that agents contain hidden generalisation capabilities and providing a new lens into the connection between model-based, model-free, and goal-conditioned RL.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent dynamics models and model-based RL, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 27 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.
Builds on
27 of 62 references.
References · 27
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 331
- 2019Monte Carlo Gradient Estimation in Machine Learningcited by 281
- 2022Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 241
- 2024OGBench: Benchmarking Offline Goal-Conditioned RLcited by 216
- 2020Reward-Free Exploration for Reinforcement Learningcited by 177
- 2021Learning One Representation to Optimize All Rewardscited by 110
- 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 102
- 2020The Value Equivalence Principle for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 88
15 more
- 2020Objective Mismatch in Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 87
- 2024Simplifying Deep Temporal Difference Learningcited by 71
- 2021Learning Successor States and Goal-Dependent Values: A Mathematical Viewpointcited by 67
- 2019Hyperbolic Discounting and Learning over Multiple Horizonscited by 58
- 2021Identifiability in inverse reinforcement learningcited by 55
- 2016Unifying task specification in reinforcement learningcited by 41
- 20251000 Layer Networks for Self-Supervised RL: Scaling Depth Can Enable New Goal-Reaching Capabilitiescited by 39
- 2021Proper Value Equivalencecited by 33
- 2024A Single Goal is All You Need: Skills and Exploration Emerge from Contrastive RL without Rewards, Demonstrations, or Subgoalscited by 20
- 2024Accelerating Goal-Conditioned RL Algorithms and Researchcited by 18
- 2025Interpreting Emergent Planning in Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 15
- 2023On Representation Complexity of Model-based and Model-free Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2023Bayesian Exploration Networkscited by 3
- 2025Inferring Transition Dynamics from Value Functionscited by 1
- 2026Local Inconsistency Resolution: The Interplay between Attention and Control in Probabilistic Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Operator-on-F complements value-equivalence: a planning-time diagnostic for latent world models
- 2026Q-Learning With World Models
- 2026Loop-Free Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Sequential Value Recovery with Q-Score Matching
- 2020Deep PQR: Solving Inverse Reinforcement Learning using Anchor Actions
- 2026Scaling World-Model Reinforcement Learning Through Diffusion Policy Optimization
- 2026A Lecture Note on Offline RL and IRL, Part II: Foundations of Inverse Reinforcement Learning and Dynamic Discrete Choice Models
- 2026How do World Models and Policies Compose in LLM Agents? A Joint Spectral and Behavioral Account
- 2019On Value Functions and the Agent-Environment Boundary