mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Note on Loss Functions and Error Compounding in Model-based Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2404.09946 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This note clarifies some confusions (and perhaps throws out more) around model-based reinforcement learning and their theoretical understanding in the context of deep RL. Main topics of discussion are (1) how to reconcile model-based RL's bad empirical reputation on error compounding with its superior theoretical properties, and (2) the limitations of empirically popular losses. For the latter, concrete counterexamples for the "MuZero loss" are constructed to show that it not only fails in stochastic environments, but also suffers exponential sample complexity in deterministic environments when data provides sufficient coverage.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2024.

Builds on

6 of 18 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
  2. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  3. 2019Kinematic State Abstraction and Provably Efficient Rich-Observation Reinforcement Learningcited by 114
  4. 2018Lipschitz Continuity in Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
  5. 2016Self-Correcting Models for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  6. 2023Representation Learning with Multi-Step Inverse Kinematics: An Efficient and Optimal Approach to Rich-Observation RLcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

7 papers.