mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Heimdall: test-time scaling on the generative verification

arXiv 2504.10337 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2025cs.AIcited by 26

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

An AI system can create and maintain knowledge only to the extent that it can verify that knowledge itself. Recent work on long Chain-of-Thought reasoning has demonstrated great potential of LLMs on solving competitive problems, but their verification ability remains to be weak and not sufficiently investigated. In this paper, we propose Heimdall, the long CoT verification LLM that can accurately judge the correctness of solutions. With pure reinforcement learning, we boost the verification accuracy from 62.5% to 94.5% on competitive math problems. By scaling with repeated sampling, the accuracy further increases to 97.5%. Through human evaluation, Heimdall demonstrates impressive generalization capabilities, successfully detecting most issues in challenging math proofs, the type of which is not included during training. Furthermore, we propose Pessimistic Verification to extend the functionality of Heimdall to scaling up the problem solving. It calls Heimdall to judge the solutions from a solver model and based on the pessimistic principle, selects the most likely correct solution with the least uncertainty. Taking DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B as the solver model, Pessimistic Verification improves the solution accuracy on AIME2025 from 54.2% to 70.0% with 16x compute budget and to 83.3% with more compute budget. With the stronger solver Gemini 2.5 Pro, the score reaches 93.0%. Finally, we prototype an automatic knowledge discovery system, a ternary system where one poses questions, another provides solutions, and the third verifies the solutions. Using the data synthesis work NuminaMath for the first two components, Heimdall effectively identifies problematic records within the dataset and reveals that nearly half of the data is flawed, which interestingly aligns with the recent ablation studies from NuminaMath.

Key facts. Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2025.

Builds on

29 of 35 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  3. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  4. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  5. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  6. 2025Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMscited by 1,193
  7. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 946
  8. 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 480
  9. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 465
  10. 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 354
  11. 2024Generative Reward Modelscited by 148
  12. 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugscited by 138
17 more
  1. 2025Competitive Programming with Large Reasoning Modelscited by 115
  2. 2025GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative Reasoningcited by 94
  3. 2024CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoningcited by 88
  4. 2024Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Modelscited by 69
  5. 2025Revisiting the Test-Time Scaling of o1-like Models: Do they Truly Possess Test-Time Scaling Capabilities?cited by 69
  6. 2025Critique Fine-Tuning: Learning to Critique is More Effective than Learning to Imitatecited by 61
  7. 2025Trading Inference-Time Compute for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 60
  8. 2025Sample, Scrutinize and Scale: Effective Inference-Time Search by Scaling Verificationcited by 49
  9. 2025MM-Verify: Enhancing Multimodal Reasoning with Chain-of-Thought Verificationcited by 39
  10. 2025Teaching Language Models to Critique via Reinforcement Learningcited by 38
  11. 2025S2R: Teaching LLMs to Self-verify and Self-correct via Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
  12. 2024Human-Centered Design Recommendations for LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 35
  13. 2024LLM-as-a-Judge & Reward Model: What They Can and Cannot Docited by 32
  14. 2023Critique Ability of Large Language Modelscited by 20
  15. 2024Training Language Models to Critique With Multi-agent Feedbackcited by 16
  16. 2025T1: Tool-integrated Verification for Test-time Compute Scaling in Small Language Modelscited by 13
  17. 2025Dyve: Thinking Fast and Slow for Dynamic Process Verificationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 19; 2026: 7.

26 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Rewardcited by 39
  2. 2025Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 38
  3. 2025PAG: Multi-Turn Reinforced LLM Self-Correction with Policy as Generative Verifiercited by 28
  4. 2025RewardAnything: Generalizable Principle-Following Reward Modelscited by 27
  5. 2025From Trial-and-Error to Improvement: A Systematic Analysis of LLM Exploration Mechanisms in RLVRcited by 16
  6. 2026V1: Unifying Generation and Self-Verification for Parallel Reasonerscited by 12
  7. 2025Scaling over Scaling: Exploring Test-Time Scaling Plateau in Large Reasoning Modelscited by 11
  8. 2026What If Consensus Lies? Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning at Test Timecited by 10
  9. 2025Faster and Better LLMs via Latency-Aware Test-Time Scalingcited by 9
  10. 2025Right Is Not Enough: The Pitfalls of Outcome Supervision in Training LLMs for Math Reasoningcited by 9
  11. 2025Self-Harmony: Learning to Harmonize Self-Supervision and Self-Play in Test-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  12. 2025Trust but Verify! A Survey on Verification Design for Test-time Scalingcited by 8
14 more
  1. 2025Scaling Generative Verifiers For Natural Language Mathematical Proof Verification And Selectioncited by 8
  2. 2025RefCritic: Training Long Chain-of-Thought Critic Models with Refinement Feedbackcited by 6
  3. 2025From Solving to Verifying: A Unified Objective for Robust Reasoning in LLMscited by 6
  4. 2025Population-Evolve: a Parallel Sampling and Evolutionary Method for LLM Math Reasoningcited by 6
  5. 2025Rethinking Optimal Verification Granularity for Compute-Efficient Test-Time Scalingcited by 5
  6. 2025OPV: Outcome-based Process Verifier for Efficient Long Chain-of-Thought Verificationcited by 4
  7. 2025Do Code Semantics Help? A Comprehensive Study on Execution Trace-Based Information for Code Large Language Modelscited by 3
  8. 2026Pseudo-Formalization for Automatic Proof Verificationcited by 3
  9. 2025Budget-aware Test-time Scaling via Discriminative Verificationcited by 2
  10. 2026Learning Generative Selection for Best-of-Ncited by 2
  11. 2026From Curiosity to Caution: Mitigating Reward Hacking for Best-of-N with Pessimismcited by 2
  12. 2025Beyond Token-level Supervision: Unlocking the Potential of Decoding-based Regression via Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  13. 2026Towards Better RL Training Data Utilization via Second-Order Rolloutcited by 1
  14. 2026Diagnosing Sampled LLM Reasoning in Formal Geometry: Coverage, Realization, and Validity Evidencecited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025DeepSeekMath-V2: Towards Self-Verifiable Mathematical Reasoning
  2. 2026FABSVer: Faster Training and Better Self-Verification for LLM Mathematical Reasoning
  3. 2025Variation in Verification: Understanding Verification Dynamics in Large Language Models
  4. 2025When To Solve, When To Verify: Compute-Optimal Problem Solving and Generative Verification for LLM Reasoning
  5. 2025DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026VeriEvol: Scaling Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Verifiable Evol-Instruct
  7. 2025Scaling Up RL: Unlocking Diverse Reasoning in LLMs via Prolonged Training
  8. 2025Self-Verifying Reflection Helps Transformers with CoT Reasoning