mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Training Language Models to Critique With Multi-agent Feedback

arXiv 2410.15287 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2024cs.CLcited by 16

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Critique ability, a meta-cognitive capability of humans, presents significant challenges for LLMs to improve. Recent works primarily rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) using critiques generated by a single LLM like GPT-4. However, these model-generated critiques often exhibit flaws due to the inherent complexity of the critique. Consequently, fine-tuning LLMs on such flawed critiques typically limits the model's performance and propagates these flaws into the learned model. To overcome these challenges, this paper proposes a novel data generation pipeline, named MultiCritique, that improves the critique ability of LLMs by utilizing multi-agent feedback in both the SFT and reinforcement learning (RL) stages. First, our data generation pipeline aggregates high-quality critiques from multiple agents instead of a single model, with crucial information as input for simplifying the critique. Furthermore, our pipeline improves the preference accuracy of critique quality through multi-agent feedback, facilitating the effectiveness of RL in improving the critique ability of LLMs. Based on our proposed MultiCritique data generation pipeline, we construct the MultiCritiqueDataset for the SFT and RL fine-tuning stages. Extensive experimental results on two benchmarks demonstrate: 1) the superior quality of our constructed SFT dataset compared to existing critique datasets; 2) additional improvements to the critique ability of LLMs brought by the RL stage. Notably, our fine-tuned 7B model significantly surpasses other advanced 7B-13B open-source models, approaching the performance of advanced 70B LLMs and GPT-4. Codes, datasets and model weights will be publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 33 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2024.

Builds on

33 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Metacognition is all you need? Using Introspection in Generative Agents to Improve Goal-directed Behavior9 Jan
  2. 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debate14 Aug

Other references · 31

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  5. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  6. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
  7. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 1,011
  8. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 752
  9. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 735
  10. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
  11. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  12. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 575
19 more
  1. 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
  2. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
  3. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 326
  4. 2023Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology Viewcited by 222
  5. 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
  6. 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugscited by 147
  7. 2024CheckEval: A reliable LLM-as-a-Judge framework for evaluating text generation using checklistscited by 94
  8. 2024CriticBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Critique-Correct Reasoningcited by 88
  9. 2024Self-Taught Evaluatorscited by 72
  10. 2023Metacognitive Prompting Improves Understanding in Large Language Modelscited by 58
  11. 2024ChatGLM-Math: Improving Math Problem-Solving in Large Language Models with a Self-Critique Pipelinecited by 47
  12. 2024Improving Reward Models with Synthetic Critiquescited by 44
  13. 2023RLCD: Reinforcement Learning from Contrastive Distillation for Language Model Alignmentcited by 43
  14. 2024Direct Judgement Preference Optimizationcited by 33
  15. 2024Arena Learning: Build Data Flywheel for LLMs Post-training via Simulated Chatbot Arenacited by 26
  16. 2024An Empirical Analysis on Large Language Models in Debate Evaluationcited by 20
  17. 2024Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretabilitycited by 19
  18. 2024CriticEval: Evaluating Large Language Model as Criticcited by 13
  19. 2024The Critique of Critiquecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 9; 2026: 5.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agentscited by 44
  2. 2025A Survey of Test-Time Compute: From Intuitive Inference to Deliberate Reasoningcited by 40
  3. 2024Large Language Models Can Self-Improve in Long-context Reasoningcited by 29
  4. 2025Heimdall: test-time scaling on the generative verificationcited by 26
  5. 2026Marco DeepResearch: Unlocking Efficient Deep Research Agents via Verification-Centric Designcited by 16
  6. 2024Automatic Evaluation for Text-to-image Generation: Task-decomposed Framework, Distilled Training, and Meta-evaluation Benchmarkcited by 14
  7. 2025CodeCriticBench: A Holistic Code Critique Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 14
  8. 2026AgentArk: Distilling Multi-Agent Intelligence into a Single LLM Agentcited by 13
  9. 2025Self-Evolving Critique Abilities in Large Language Modelscited by 12
  10. 2025Debate, Reflect, and Distill: Multi-Agent Feedback with Tree-Structured Preference Optimization for Efficient Language Model Enhancementcited by 10
  11. 2025Training Language Model to Critique for Better Refinementcited by 7
  12. 2025Putting on the Thinking Hats: A Survey on Chain of Thought Fine-tuning from the Perspective of Human Reasoning Mechanismcited by 4
4 more
  1. 2026Teaching Large Reasoning Models Effective Reflectioncited by 4
  2. 2025SEOE: A Scalable and Reliable Semantic Evaluation Framework for Open Domain Event Detectioncited by 3
  3. 2025Med-REFL: Medical Reasoning Enhancement via Self-Corrected Fine-grained Reflectioncited by 3
  4. 2026Taming Actor-Observer Asymmetry in Agents via Dialectical Alignmentcited by 2

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Critique-RL: Training Language Models for Critiquing through Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026Beyond Corrected Actions: Training LLM Agents on Textual Critiques
  3. 2025Critique-Coder: Enhancing Coder Models by Critique Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2025Self-Improvement of Language Models by Post-Training on Multi-Agent Debate
  5. 2025The Lighthouse of Language: Enhancing LLM Agents via Critique-Guided Improvement
  6. 2025Agent-R: Training Language Model Agents to Reflect via Iterative Self-Training
  7. 2023RL4F: Generating Natural Language Feedback with Reinforcement Learning for Repairing Model Outputs
  8. 2026Conversation for Non-verifiable Learning: Self-Evolving LLMs through Meta-Evaluation