FABSVer: Faster Training and Better Self-Verification for LLM Mathematical Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models have made significant progress in mathematical reasoning, they remain unreliable at judging the correctness of their own solutions. Existing approaches that equip models with self-verification typically treat solution generation and verification as two separate tasks, leading to substantially increased training time. In this paper, we propose FABSVer, which fuses these two tasks into a single generation pass, dramatically reducing training overhead while jointly optimizing both capabilities. We further identify a convergence bottleneck both theoretically and empirically: as training progresses, the reward reaches a plateau because the policy is constrained by a fixed reference model. To overcome this, we introduce Dynamic Reference Model Update (DRMU), which raises the reward ceiling and enables sustained reward growth. Extensive experiments on math benchmarks demonstrate that FABSVer achieves superior self-verification and reasoning performance across three model scales, while requiring only 51%--71% of the training time of existing methods. Analysis further reveals distinct learning phases in how models acquire self-verification, and that the gap between verify and answer rewards shrinks noticeably as model size increases.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025DeepSeekMath-V2: Towards Self-Verifiable Mathematical Reasoning27 Nov
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models5 Feb
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models29 Jun
Other references · 14
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 511
- 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 461
- 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 279
- 2025Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 38
- 2025Learning to Solve and Verify: A Self-Play Framework for Code and Test Generationcited by 35
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Scalable LLM Reasoning Acceleration with Low-rank Distillation
- 2025A Model Can Help Itself: Reward-Free Self-Training for LLM Reasoning
- 2024Self-training Language Models for Arithmetic Reasoning
- 2024MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time
- 2025MathBode: Measuring the Stability of LLM Reasoning using Frequency Response
- 2025MARGE: Improving Math Reasoning for LLMs with Guided Exploration
- 2026Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
- 2024Self-Explore: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models with Fine-grained Rewards