Trust but Verify! A Survey on Verification Design for Test-time Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time scaling (TTS) has emerged as a new frontier for scaling the performance of Large Language Models. In test-time scaling, by using more computational resources during inference, LLMs can improve their reasoning process and task performance. Several approaches have emerged for TTS such as distilling reasoning traces from another model or exploring the vast decoding search space by employing a verifier. The verifiers serve as reward models that help score the candidate outputs from the decoding process to diligently explore the vast solution space and select the best outcome. This paradigm commonly termed has emerged as a superior approach owing to parameter free scaling at inference time and high performance gains. The verifiers could be prompt-based, fine-tuned as a discriminative or generative model to verify process paths, outcomes or both. Despite their widespread adoption, there is no detailed collection, clear categorization and discussion of diverse verification approaches and their training mechanisms. In this survey, we cover the diverse approaches in the literature and present a unified view of verifier training, types and their utility in test-time scaling. Our repository can be found at https://github.com/elixir-research-group/Verifierstesttimescaling.github.io.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 45 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2025.
Builds on
45 of 96 references.
Closest ancestors · 12
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Revisiting Test-Time Scaling: A Survey and a Diversity-Aware Method for Efficient Reasoning5 Jun
- 2025Solve-Detect-Verify: Inference-Time Scaling with Flexible Generative Verifier17 May
- 2025To Backtrack or Not to Backtrack: When Sequential Search Limits Model Reasoning9 Apr
- 2025T1: Tool-integrated Verification for Test-time Compute Scaling in Small Language Models7 Apr
- 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?31 Mar
- 2025START: Self-taught Reasoner with Tools6 Mar
- 2025Scaling Test-Time Compute Without Verification or RL is Suboptimal17 Feb
- 2025Learning to Reason from Feedback at Test-Time16 Feb
- 2025Dyve: Thinking Fast and Slow for Dynamic Process Verification16 Feb
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters6 Aug
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models17 May
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning28 Mar
Other references · 33
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
- 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
- 2024RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modelingcited by 499
- 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
- 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
- 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Datacited by 344
21 more
- 2025Learning to Reason without External Rewardscited by 210
- 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Stylecited by 176
- 2025VisualPRM: An Effective Process Reward Model for Multimodal Reasoningcited by 139
- 2025Process Reward Models That Thinkcited by 118
- 2025J1: Incentivizing Thinking in LLM-as-a-Judge via Reinforcement Learningcited by 75
- 2024Offline Reinforcement Learning for LLM Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 54
- 2024The Limits of Inference Scaling Through Resamplingcited by 53
- 2024When is Tree Search Useful for LLM Planning? It Depends on the Discriminatorcited by 47
- 2025RL Tango: Reinforcing Generator and Verifier Together for Language Reasoningcited by 40
- 2025Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 38
- 2024AutoPSV: Automated Process-Supervised Verifiercited by 30
- 2025Heimdall: test-time scaling on the generative verificationcited by 26
- 2025Think-J: Learning to Think for Generative LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 21
- 2025Supervising the search process produces reliable and generalizable information-seeking agentscited by 20
- 2025VerifyBench: Benchmarking Reference-based Reward Systems for Large Language Modelscited by 20
- 2025RvLLM: LLM Runtime Verification with Domain Knowledgecited by 17
- 2024VerifierQ: Enhancing LLM Test Time Compute with Q-Learning-based Verifierscited by 14
- 2025Putting the Value Back in RL: Better Test-Time Scaling by Unifying LLM Reasoners With Verifierscited by 14
- 2025Reasoning-as-Logic-Units: Scaling Test-Time Reasoning in Large Language Models Through Logic Unit Alignmentcited by 12
- 2025CMCTS: A Constrained Monte Carlo Tree Search Framework for Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Modelcited by 9
- 2025Efficient PRM Training Data Synthesis via Formal Verificationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 7.
8 papers.
- 2026The Last AI Built by Humans: Toward Genuine Recursive Self-Improvementcited by 11
- 2026DatBench: Discriminative, Faithful, and Efficient VLM Evaluationscited by 10
- 2026Tool Verification for Test-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
- 2026Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verificationcited by 5
- 2025Think Right, Not More: Test-Time Scaling for Numerical Claim Verificationcited by 2
- 2026Oracle Gap and Signal Fidelity: A Fixed-Pool Diagnostic for Test-Time Collaborationcited by 2
- 2026One-Token Verification for Reasoning Correctness Estimationcited by 1
- 2026Beyond Fault Localization: A Trajectory-Level Study of LLM Agents for Microservice Root Cause Analysiscited by 0
- 2026The Last AI Built by Humans: Toward Genuine Recursive Self-Improvement10 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Fault Localization: A Trajectory-Level Study of LLM Agents for Microservice Root Cause Analysis21 Aug 2026
- 2026Oracle Gap and Signal Fidelity: A Fixed-Pool Diagnostic for Test-Time Collaboration20 Jul 2026
- 2026Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verification3 Mar 2026
- 2026Tool Verification for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning2 Mar 2026
- 2026One-Token Verification for Reasoning Correctness Estimation1 Mar 2026
- 2026DatBench: Discriminative, Faithful, and Efficient VLM Evaluations5 Jan 2026
- 2025Think Right, Not More: Test-Time Scaling for Numerical Claim Verification26 Sep 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Step-level Verifier-guided Hybrid Test-Time Scaling for Large Language Models
- 2025The Art of Scaling Test-Time Compute for Large Language Models
- 2025Are We Scaling the Right Thing? A System Perspective on Test-Time Scaling
- 2026Consilience for Verifier-Free Test-Time Scaling
- 2025Rethinking Optimal Verification Granularity for Compute-Efficient Test-Time Scaling
- 2025Budget-aware Test-time Scaling via Discriminative Verification
- 2025Variation in Verification: Understanding Verification Dynamics in Large Language Models
- 2025First Finish Search: Efficient Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models