mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explicit-NeRF-QA: A Quality Assessment Database for Explicit NeRF Model Compression

arXiv 2407.08165 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) have demonstrated significant advantages in representing and synthesizing 3D scenes. Explicit NeRF models facilitate the practical NeRF applications with faster rendering speed, and also attract considerable attention in NeRF compression due to its huge storage cost. To address the challenge of the NeRF compression study, in this paper, we construct a new dataset, called Explicit-NeRF-QA. We use 22 3D objects with diverse geometries, textures, and material complexities to train four typical explicit NeRF models across five parameter levels. Lossy compression is introduced during the model generation, pivoting the selection of key parameters such as hash table size for InstantNGP and voxel grid resolution for Plenoxels. By rendering NeRF samples to processed video sequences (PVS), a large scale subjective experiment with lab environment is conducted to collect subjective scores from 21 viewers. The diversity of content, accuracy of mean opinion scores (MOS), and characteristics of NeRF distortion are comprehensively presented, establishing the heterogeneity of the proposed dataset. The state-of-the-art objective metrics are tested in the new dataset. Best Person correlation, which is around 0.85, is collected from the full-reference objective metric. All tested no-reference metrics report very poor results with 0.4 to 0.6 correlations, demonstrating the need for further development of more robust no-reference metrics. The dataset, including NeRF samples, source 3D objects, multiview images for NeRF generation, PVSs, MOS, is made publicly available at the following location: https://github.com/YukeXing/Explicit-NeRF-QA.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.

Builds on

19 of 41 references.

References · 19

  1. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  2. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,698
  3. 2021Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural Networkscited by 1,607
  4. 2022TensoRF: Tensorial Radiance Fieldscited by 1,275
  5. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 974
  6. 2021Direct Voxel Grid Optimization: Super-fast Convergence for Radiance Fields Reconstructioncited by 961
  7. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  8. 2019Local Light Field Fusion: Practical View Synthesis with Prescriptive Sampling Guidelinescited by 672
  9. 2022Variable Bitrate Neural Fieldscited by 116
  10. 2022Compressible-composable NeRF via Rank-residual Decompositioncited by 92
  11. 2022Compressing Volumetric Radiance Fields to 1 MBcited by 66
  12. 2022Masked Wavelet Representation for Compact Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 57
7 more
  1. 2022Compressing Explicit Voxel Grid Representations: fast NeRFs become also smallcited by 48
  2. 2023Perceptual Quality Assessment of NeRF and Neural View Synthesis Methods for Front-Facing Viewscited by 17
  3. 2023TSMD: A Database for Static Color Mesh Quality Assessment Studycited by 11
  4. 2023SJTU-TMQA: A quality assessment database for static mesh with texture mapcited by 10
  5. 2024NeRF View Synthesis: Subjective Quality Assessment and Objective Metrics Evaluationcited by 10
  6. 2023NeRF-QA: Neural Radiance Fields Quality Assessment Databasecited by 5
  7. 2023TDMD: A Database for Dynamic Color Mesh Subjective and Objective Quality Explorationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

8 papers.