Explicit-NeRF-QA: A Quality Assessment Database for Explicit NeRF Model Compression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) have demonstrated significant advantages in representing and synthesizing 3D scenes. Explicit NeRF models facilitate the practical NeRF applications with faster rendering speed, and also attract considerable attention in NeRF compression due to its huge storage cost. To address the challenge of the NeRF compression study, in this paper, we construct a new dataset, called Explicit-NeRF-QA. We use 22 3D objects with diverse geometries, textures, and material complexities to train four typical explicit NeRF models across five parameter levels. Lossy compression is introduced during the model generation, pivoting the selection of key parameters such as hash table size for InstantNGP and voxel grid resolution for Plenoxels. By rendering NeRF samples to processed video sequences (PVS), a large scale subjective experiment with lab environment is conducted to collect subjective scores from 21 viewers. The diversity of content, accuracy of mean opinion scores (MOS), and characteristics of NeRF distortion are comprehensively presented, establishing the heterogeneity of the proposed dataset. The state-of-the-art objective metrics are tested in the new dataset. Best Person correlation, which is around 0.85, is collected from the full-reference objective metric. All tested no-reference metrics report very poor results with 0.4 to 0.6 correlations, demonstrating the need for further development of more robust no-reference metrics. The dataset, including NeRF samples, source 3D objects, multiview images for NeRF generation, PVSs, MOS, is made publicly available at the following location: https://github.com/YukeXing/Explicit-NeRF-QA.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.
Builds on
19 of 41 references.
References · 19
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,698
- 2021Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural Networkscited by 1,607
- 2022TensoRF: Tensorial Radiance Fieldscited by 1,275
- 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 974
- 2021Direct Voxel Grid Optimization: Super-fast Convergence for Radiance Fields Reconstructioncited by 961
- 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
- 2019Local Light Field Fusion: Practical View Synthesis with Prescriptive Sampling Guidelinescited by 672
- 2022Variable Bitrate Neural Fieldscited by 116
- 2022Compressible-composable NeRF via Rank-residual Decompositioncited by 92
- 2022Compressing Volumetric Radiance Fields to 1 MBcited by 66
- 2022Masked Wavelet Representation for Compact Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 57
7 more
- 2022Compressing Explicit Voxel Grid Representations: fast NeRFs become also smallcited by 48
- 2023Perceptual Quality Assessment of NeRF and Neural View Synthesis Methods for Front-Facing Viewscited by 17
- 2023TSMD: A Database for Static Color Mesh Quality Assessment Studycited by 11
- 2023SJTU-TMQA: A quality assessment database for static mesh with texture mapcited by 10
- 2024NeRF View Synthesis: Subjective Quality Assessment and Objective Metrics Evaluationcited by 10
- 2023NeRF-QA: Neural Radiance Fields Quality Assessment Databasecited by 5
- 2023TDMD: A Database for Dynamic Color Mesh Subjective and Objective Quality Explorationscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024A Hierarchical Compression Technique for 3D Gaussian Splatting Compressioncited by 14
- 2025GS-QA: Comprehensive Quality Assessment Benchmark for Gaussian Splatting View Synthesiscited by 8
- 20253DGS-IEval-15K: A Large-scale Image Quality Evaluation Database for 3D Gaussian-Splattingcited by 6
- 20253DGS-VBench: A Comprehensive Video Quality Evaluation Benchmark for 3DGS Compressioncited by 2
- 2025Non-Aligned Reference Image Quality Assessment for Novel View Synthesiscited by 1
- 2025Exploring Metric Fusion for Evaluation of NeRFscited by 0
- 2026SpatialQ: Understanding 3D Gaussian Splatting Scene Quality via Visual-based MLLMcited by 0
- 2026From Explicit References to Scene Manifolds: Distributional Fidelity and Realism for Radiance Field Quality Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026From Explicit References to Scene Manifolds: Distributional Fidelity and Realism for Radiance Field Quality Assessment7 Sep 2026
- 2026SpatialQ: Understanding 3D Gaussian Splatting Scene Quality via Visual-based MLLM29 Jul 2026
- 2025Non-Aligned Reference Image Quality Assessment for Novel View Synthesis11 Nov 2025
- 2025Exploring Metric Fusion for Evaluation of NeRFs16 Sep 2025
- 20253DGS-VBench: A Comprehensive Video Quality Evaluation Benchmark for 3DGS Compression9 Aug 2025
- 20253DGS-IEval-15K: A Large-scale Image Quality Evaluation Database for 3D Gaussian-Splatting17 Jun 2025
- 2025GS-QA: Comprehensive Quality Assessment Benchmark for Gaussian Splatting View Synthesis18 Feb 2025
- 2024A Hierarchical Compression Technique for 3D Gaussian Splatting Compression11 Nov 2024