SJTU-TMQA: A quality assessment database for static mesh with texture map
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, static meshes with texture maps have become one of the most prevalent digital representations of 3D shapes in various applications, such as animation, gaming, medical imaging, and cultural heritage applications. However, little research has been done on the quality assessment of textured meshes, which hinders the development of quality-oriented applications, such as mesh compression and enhancement. In this paper, we create a large-scale textured mesh quality assessment database, namely SJTU-TMQA, which includes 21 reference meshes and 945 distorted samples. The meshes are rendered into processed video sequences and then conduct subjective experiments to obtain mean opinion scores (MOS). The diversity of content and accuracy of MOS has been shown to validate its heterogeneity and reliability. The impact of various types of distortion on human perception is demonstrated. 13 state-of-the-art objective metrics are evaluated on SJTU-TMQA. The results report the highest correlation of around 0.6, indicating the need for more effective objective metrics. The SJTU-TMQA is available at https://ccccby.github.io
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2023.
Builds on
4 of 23 references.
References · 4
- 2022Textured Mesh Quality Assessment: Large-Scale Dataset and Deep Learning-based Quality Metriccited by 26
- 2023TSMD: A Database for Static Color Mesh Quality Assessment Studycited by 11
- 2023TDMD: A Database for Dynamic Color Mesh Subjective and Objective Quality Explorationscited by 5
- 2023GeodesicPSIM: Predicting the Quality of Static Mesh with Texture Map via Geodesic Patch Similaritycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024Explicit-NeRF-QA: A Quality Assessment Database for Explicit NeRF Model Compressioncited by 8
- 2025MUGSQA: Novel Multi-Uncertainty-Based Gaussian Splatting Quality Assessment Method, Dataset, and Benchmarkscited by 4
- 2025Towards Fine-Grained Text-to-3D Quality Assessment: A Benchmark and A Two-Stage Rank-Learning Metriccited by 3
- 2025DHQA-4D: Perceptual Quality Assessment of Dynamic 4D Digital Humancited by 3
- 2024HybridMQA: Exploring Geometry-Texture Interactions for Colored Mesh Quality Assessmentcited by 2
- 2025Textured mesh Quality Assessment using Geometry and Color Field Similaritycited by 0
- 2025MicroRicci: A Greedy and Local Ricci Flow Solver for Self-Tuning Mesh Smoothingcited by 0
- 2025SRAM: Shape-Realism Alignment Metric for No Reference 3D Shape Evaluationcited by 0
- 2025Textured Geometry Evaluation: Perceptual 3D Textured Shape Metric via 3D Latent-Geometry Networkcited by 0
- 2026When Visual Quality Misleads: Intent Recognition under Rendered Avatar Distortionscited by 0
- 2026When Visual Quality Misleads: Intent Recognition under Rendered Avatar Distortions23 Sep 2026
- 2025Textured Geometry Evaluation: Perceptual 3D Textured Shape Metric via 3D Latent-Geometry Network1 Dec 2025
- 2025SRAM: Shape-Realism Alignment Metric for No Reference 3D Shape Evaluation1 Dec 2025
- 2025MUGSQA: Novel Multi-Uncertainty-Based Gaussian Splatting Quality Assessment Method, Dataset, and Benchmarks10 Nov 2025
- 2025DHQA-4D: Perceptual Quality Assessment of Dynamic 4D Digital Human4 Oct 2025
- 2025Towards Fine-Grained Text-to-3D Quality Assessment: A Benchmark and A Two-Stage Rank-Learning Metric28 Sep 2025
- 2025MicroRicci: A Greedy and Local Ricci Flow Solver for Self-Tuning Mesh Smoothing18 Jun 2025
- 2025Textured mesh Quality Assessment using Geometry and Color Field Similarity16 May 2025
- 2024HybridMQA: Exploring Geometry-Texture Interactions for Colored Mesh Quality Assessment2 Dec 2024
- 2024Explicit-NeRF-QA: A Quality Assessment Database for Explicit NeRF Model Compression11 Jul 2024