mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Validity Learning on Failures: Mitigating the Distribution Shift in Autonomous Vehicle Planning

arXiv 2406.01544 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Imitation-learning end-to-end planners

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The planning problem constitutes a fundamental aspect of the autonomous driving framework. Recent strides in representation learning have empowered vehicles to comprehend their surrounding environments, thereby facilitating the integration of learning-based planning strategies. Among these approaches, Imitation Learning stands out due to its notable training efficiency. However, traditional Imitation Learning methodologies encounter challenges associated with the co-variate shift phenomenon. We propose Validity Learning on Failures, VL(on failure), as a remedy to address this issue. The essence of our method lies in deploying a pre-trained planner across diverse scenarios. Instances where the planner deviates from its immediate objectives, such as maintaining a safe distance from obstacles or adhering to traffic rules, are flagged as failures. The states corresponding to these failures are compiled into a new dataset, termed the failure dataset. Notably, the absence of expert annotations for this data precludes the applicability of standard imitation learning approaches. To facilitate learning from the closed-loop mistakes, we introduce the VL objective which aims to discern valid trajectories within the current environmental context. Experimental evaluations conducted on both reactive CARLA simulation and non-reactive log-replay simulations reveal substantial enhancements in closed-loop metrics such as textitScore, Progress, and Success Rate, underscoring the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. Further evaluations against the Bench2Drive benchmark demonstrate that VL(on failure) outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation-learning end-to-end planners, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 27 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2024.

Builds on

27 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Imitation Is Not Enough: Robustifying Imitation with Reinforcement Learning for Challenging Driving Scenarios21 Dec
  2. 2022Hierarchical Model-Based Imitation Learning for Planning in Autonomous Driving18 Oct
  3. 2021Urban Driver: Learning to Drive from Real-world Demonstrations Using Policy Gradients27 Sep

Other references · 24

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  2. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
  3. 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,213
  4. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Drivingcited by 1,068
  5. 2023VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Drivingcited by 613
  6. 2020VectorNet: Encoding HD Maps and Agent Dynamics from Vectorized Representationcited by 528
  7. 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontierscited by 485
  8. 2018ChauffeurNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worstcited by 391
  9. 2020TNT: Target-driveN Trajectory Predictioncited by 345
  10. 2016A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehiclescited by 251
  11. 2022Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baselinecited by 247
  12. 2021MultiPath++: Efficient Information Fusion and Trajectory Aggregation for Behavior Predictioncited by 246
12 more
  1. 2023Parting with Misconceptions about Learning-based Vehicle Motion Planningcited by 238
  2. 2023Rethinking the Open-Loop Evaluation of End-to-End Autonomous Driving in nuScenescited by 191
  3. 2017DART: Noise Injection for Robust Imitation Learningcited by 187
  4. 2018Differentiable MPC for End-to-end Planning and Controlcited by 178
  5. 2023Think Twice before Driving: Towards Scalable Decoders for End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 168
  6. 2023DriveAdapter: Breaking the Coupling Barrier of Perception and Planning in End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 142
  7. 2018Baidu Apollo EM Motion Plannercited by 99
  8. 2023Learning Realistic Traffic Agents in Closed-loopcited by 24
  9. 2023Blending Imitation and Reinforcement Learning for Robust Policy Improvementcited by 16
  10. 2021Limitations and Improvements of the Intelligent Driver Model (IDM)cited by 15
  11. 2024Analysis of a Modular Autonomous Driving Architecture: The Top Submission to CARLA Leaderboard 2.0 Challengecited by 8
  12. 2021A Sufficient Condition for Convex Hull Property in General Convex Spatio-Temporal Corridorscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Learning from Demonstrations of Critical Driving Behaviours Using Driver's Risk Field
  2. 2025Exposing the Copycat Problem of Imitation-based Planner: A Novel Closed-Loop Simulator, Causal Benchmark and Joint IL-RL Baseline
  3. 2024LHPF: Look back the History and Plan for the Future in Autonomous Driving
  4. 2022Embedding Synthetic Off-Policy Experience for Autonomous Driving via Zero-Shot Curricula
  5. 2026What Probing Reveals about Autonomous Driving: Linking Internal Prediction Errors to Ego Planning
  6. 2025Sequence of Expert: Boosting Imitation Planners for Autonomous Driving through Temporal Alternation
  7. 2024PLUTO: Pushing the Limit of Imitation Learning-based Planning for Autonomous Driving
  8. 2022Distribution-aware Goal Prediction and Conformant Model-based Planning for Safe Autonomous Driving