mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ACTER: Diverse and Actionable Counterfactual Sequences for Explaining and Diagnosing RL Policies

arXiv 2402.06503 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how failure occurs and how it can be prevented in reinforcement learning (RL) is necessary to enable debugging, maintain user trust, and develop personalized policies. Counterfactual reasoning has often been used to assign blame and understand failure by searching for the closest possible world in which the failure is avoided. However, current counterfactual state explanations in RL can only explain an outcome using just the current state features and offer no actionable recourse on how a negative outcome could have been prevented. In this work, we propose ACTER (Actionable Counterfactual Sequences for Explaining Reinforcement Learning Outcomes), an algorithm for generating counterfactual sequences that provides actionable advice on how failure can be avoided. ACTER investigates actions leading to a failure and uses the evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II to generate counterfactual sequences of actions that prevent it with minimal changes and high certainty even in stochastic environments. Additionally, ACTER generates a set of multiple diverse counterfactual sequences that enable users to correct failure in the way that best fits their preferences. We also introduce three diversity metrics that can be used for evaluating the diversity of counterfactual sequences. We evaluate ACTER in two RL environments, with both discrete and continuous actions, and show that it can generate actionable and diverse counterfactual sequences. We conduct a user study to explore how explanations generated by ACTER help users identify and correct failure.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2024.

Builds on

24 of 38 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  2. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 698
  3. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  4. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overviewcited by 327
  5. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
  6. 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
  7. 2019FACE: Feasible and Actionable Counterfactual Explanationscited by 232
  8. 2019Explainable Reinforcement Learning Through a Causal Lenscited by 177
  9. 2020Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanationscited by 157
  10. 2017Visualizing and Understanding Atari Agentscited by 141
  11. 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 139
  12. 2021Towards Robust and Reliable Algorithmic Recoursecited by 101
12 more
  1. 2019Exploratory Not Explanatory: Counterfactual Analysis of Saliency Maps for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  2. 2019Interestingness Elements for Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Understanding Agents' Capabilities and Limitationscited by 50
  3. 2019Explain Your Move: Understanding Agent Actions Using Specific and Relevant Feature Attributioncited by 50
  4. 2021Counterfactual State Explanations for Reinforcement Learning Agents via Generative Deep Learningcited by 38
  5. 2021Counterfactual Explanations in Sequential Decision Making Under Uncertaintycited by 36
  6. 2020What Did You Think Would Happen? Explaining Agent Behaviour Through Intended Outcomescited by 20
  7. 2023GANterfactual-RL: Understanding Reinforcement Learning Agents' Strategies through Visual Counterfactual Explanationscited by 17
  8. 2020Distal Explanations for Model-free Explainable Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  9. 2023Finding Counterfactually Optimal Action Sequences in Continuous State Spacescited by 12
  10. 2021Visual Explanation using Attention Mechanism in Actor-Critic-based Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
  11. 2018Learn to Interpret Atari Agentscited by 6
  12. 2023RACCER: Towards Reachable and Certain Counterfactual Explanations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.