mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semifactual Explanations for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2409.05435 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2024cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a learning paradigm in which the agent learns from its environment through trial and error. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms represent the agent's policies using neural networks, making their decisions difficult to interpret. Explaining the behaviour of DRL agents is necessary to advance user trust, increase engagement, and facilitate integration with real-life tasks. Semifactual explanations aim to explain an outcome by providing "even if" scenarios, such as "even if the car were moving twice as slowly, it would still have to swerve to avoid crashing". Semifactuals help users understand the effects of different factors on the outcome and support the optimisation of resources. While extensively studied in psychology and even utilised in supervised learning, semifactuals have not been used to explain the decisions of RL systems. In this work, we develop a first approach to generating semifactual explanations for RL agents. We start by defining five properties of desirable semifactual explanations in RL and then introducing SGRL-Rewind and SGRL-Advance, the first algorithms for generating semifactual explanations in RL. We evaluate the algorithms in two standard RL environments and find that they generate semifactuals that are easier to reach, represent the agent's policy better, and are more diverse compared to baselines. Lastly, we conduct and analyse a user study to assess the participant's perception of semifactual explanations of the agent's actions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2024.

Builds on

18 of 33 references.

References · 18

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  3. 2017A Brief Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 466
  4. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  5. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
  6. 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 139
  7. 2020On Generating Plausible Counterfactual and Semi-Factual Explanations for Deep Learningcited by 60
  8. 2021Counterfactual State Explanations for Reinforcement Learning Agents via Generative Deep Learningcited by 38
  9. 2021Counterfactual Explanations in Sequential Decision Making Under Uncertaintycited by 36
  10. 2019Explainability in Human-Agent Systemscited by 34
  11. 2023Even if Explanations: Prior Work, Desiderata & Benchmarks for Semi-Factual XAIcited by 20
  12. 2023GANterfactual-RL: Understanding Reinforcement Learning Agents' Strategies through Visual Counterfactual Explanationscited by 17
6 more
  1. 2022Redefining Counterfactual Explanations for Reinforcement Learning: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 12
  2. 2023Finding Counterfactually Optimal Action Sequences in Continuous State Spacescited by 12
  3. 2023The Utility of "Even if..." Semifactual Explanation to Optimise Positive Outcomescited by 8
  4. 2023RACCER: Towards Reachable and Certain Counterfactual Explanations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
  5. 2024Even-Ifs From If-Onlys: Are the Best Semi-Factual Explanations Found Using Counterfactuals As Guides?cited by 5
  6. 2024ACTER: Diverse and Actionable Counterfactual Sequences for Explaining and Diagnosing RL Policiescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.