Distal Explanations for Model-free Explainable Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we introduce and evaluate a distal explanation model for model-free reinforcement learning agents that can generate explanations for `why' and `why not' questions. Our starting point is the observation that causal models can generate opportunity chains that take the form of `A enables B and B causes C'. Using insights from an analysis of 240 explanations generated in a human-agent experiment, we define a distal explanation model that can analyse counterfactuals and opportunity chains using decision trees and causal models. A recurrent neural network is employed to learn opportunity chains, and decision trees are used to improve the accuracy of task prediction and the generated counterfactuals. We computationally evaluate the model in 6 reinforcement learning benchmarks using different reinforcement learning algorithms. From a study with 90 human participants, we show that our distal explanation model results in improved outcomes over three scenarios compared with two baseline explanation models.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2023Bridging the Human-AI Knowledge Gap: Concept Discovery and Transfer in AlphaZerocited by 42
- 2021Iterative Bounding MDPs: Learning Interpretable Policies via Non-Interpretable Methodscited by 31
- 2021Explainable Autonomous Robots: A Survey and Perspectivecited by 15
- 2022Explainability in reinforcement learning: perspective and positioncited by 11
- 2021Contrastive Explanations for Comparing Preferences of Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 5
- 2022Evaluating Human-like Explanations for Robot Actions in Reinforcement Learning Scenarioscited by 5
- 2021Seven challenges for harmonizing explainability requirementscited by 4
- 2024ACTER: Diverse and Actionable Counterfactual Sequences for Explaining and Diagnosing RL Policiescited by 4
- 2023Leveraging Reward Consistency for Interpretable Feature Discovery in Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2021A Framework of Explanation Generation toward Reliable Autonomous Robotscited by 2
- 2026M2-PALE: A Framework for Explaining Multi-Agent MCTS--Minimax Hybrids via Process Mining and LLMscited by 0
- 2026Sample-Efficient Learning of Probabilistic Causes for Reachability in Markov Decision Processes with Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 0
- 2026Sample-Efficient Learning of Probabilistic Causes for Reachability in Markov Decision Processes with Probabilistic Guarantees29 Jun 2026
- 2026M2-PALE: A Framework for Explaining Multi-Agent MCTS--Minimax Hybrids via Process Mining and LLMs16 Apr 2026
- 2024ACTER: Diverse and Actionable Counterfactual Sequences for Explaining and Diagnosing RL Policies9 Feb 2024
- 2023Bridging the Human-AI Knowledge Gap: Concept Discovery and Transfer in AlphaZero25 Oct 2023
- 2023Leveraging Reward Consistency for Interpretable Feature Discovery in Reinforcement Learning4 Sep 2023
- 2022Evaluating Human-like Explanations for Robot Actions in Reinforcement Learning Scenarios7 Jul 2022
- 2022Explainability in reinforcement learning: perspective and position22 Mar 2022
- 2021Contrastive Explanations for Comparing Preferences of Reinforcement Learning Agents17 Dec 2021
- 2021Seven challenges for harmonizing explainability requirements11 Aug 2021
- 2021A Framework of Explanation Generation toward Reliable Autonomous Robots6 May 2021
- 2021Explainable Autonomous Robots: A Survey and Perspective6 May 2021
- 2021Iterative Bounding MDPs: Learning Interpretable Policies via Non-Interpretable Methods25 Feb 2021