Learning to Complement with Multiple Humans
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Real-world image classification tasks tend to be complex, where expert labellers are sometimes unsure about the classes present in the images, leading to the issue of learning with noisy labels (LNL). The ill-posedness of the LNL task requires the adoption of strong assumptions or the use of multiple noisy labels per training image, resulting in accurate models that work well in isolation but fail to optimise human-AI collaborative classification (HAI-CC). Unlike such LNL methods, HAI-CC aims to leverage the synergies between human expertise and AI capabilities but requires clean training labels, limiting its real-world applicability. This paper addresses this gap by introducing the innovative Learning to Complement with Multiple Humans (LECOMH) approach. LECOMH is designed to learn from noisy labels without depending on clean labels, simultaneously maximising collaborative accuracy while minimising the cost of human collaboration, measured by the number of human expert annotations required per image. Additionally, new benchmarks featuring multiple noisy labels for both training and testing are proposed to evaluate HAI-CC methods. Through quantitative comparisons on these benchmarks, LECOMH consistently outperforms competitive HAI-CC approaches, human labellers, multi-rater learning, and noisy-label learning methods across various datasets, offering a promising solution for addressing real-world image classification challenges.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 68 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2023.
Builds on
68 of 102 references.
References · 68
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017ChestX-ray8: Hospital-scale Chest X-ray Database and Benchmarks on Weakly-Supervised Classification and Localization of Common Thorax Diseasescited by 969
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
38 more
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 262
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
- 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 228
- 2021A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learningcited by 214
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2020Learning to Complement Humanscited by 123
- 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
- 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
- 2021Sample Selection with Uncertainty of Losses for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 79
- 2017Who Said What: Modeling Individual Labelers Improves Classificationcited by 77
- 2021Differentiable Learning Under Triagecited by 74
- 2021Towards Unbiased and Accurate Deferral to Multiple Expertscited by 71
- 2021Learning Fast Sample Re-weighting Without Reward Datacited by 69
- 2022Calibrated Learning to Defer with One-vs-All Classifierscited by 68
- 2023Who Should Predict? Exact Algorithms For Learning to Defer to Humanscited by 68
- 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
- 2022Learning to Defer to Multiple Experts: Consistent Surrogate Losses, Confidence Calibration, and Conformal Ensemblescited by 59
- 2020Classification with Rejection Based on Cost-sensitive Classificationcited by 55
- 2022Improving Expert Predictions with Conformal Predictioncited by 54
- 2017Learning From Noisy Singly-labeled Datacited by 50
- 2021Hard Sample Aware Noise Robust Learning for Histopathology Image Classificationcited by 48
- 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
- 2022Sample Efficient Learning of Predictors that Complement Humanscited by 46
- 2021LongReMix: Robust Learning with High Confidence Samples in a Noisy Label Environmentcited by 40
- 2021Combining Human Predictions with Model Probabilities via Confusion Matrices and Calibrationcited by 40
- 2022Forming Effective Human-AI Teams: Building Machine Learning Models that Complement the Capabilities of Multiple Expertscited by 40
- 2021Faster Meta Update Strategy for Noise-Robust Deep Learningcited by 38
- 2023Principled Approaches for Learning to Defer with Multiple Expertscited by 38
- 2021Do Humans Trust Advice More if it Comes from AI? An Analysis of Human-AI Interactionscited by 35
- 2022Identifiability of Label Noise Transition Matrixcited by 34
- 2022On the Utility of Prediction Sets in Human-AI Teamscited by 34
- 2021Teaching Humans When To Defer to a Classifier via Exemplarscited by 29
- 2019Max-MIG: an Information Theoretic Approach for Joint Learning from Crowdscited by 26
- 2023In Defense of Softmax Parametrization for Calibrated and Consistent Learning to Defercited by 26
50 most cited of 68 All 68 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Expertscited by 4
- 2025No Need for Learning to Defer? A Training Free Deferral Framework to Multiple Experts through Conformal Predictioncited by 2
- 2026L2CU: Learning to Complement Unseen Userscited by 2
- 2026When More Experts Hurt: Underfitting in Multi-Expert Learning to Defercited by 2
- 2026Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemmacited by 0
- 2026Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemma28 Feb 2026
- 2026When More Experts Hurt: Underfitting in Multi-Expert Learning to Defer19 Feb 2026
- 2026L2CU: Learning to Complement Unseen Users3 Jan 2026
- 2025No Need for Learning to Defer? A Training Free Deferral Framework to Multiple Experts through Conformal Prediction16 Sep 2025
- 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Experts18 Nov 2024