mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methods

arXiv 2309.10966 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 33

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent research in decoding methods for Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks has shown that MAP decoding is not optimal, because model probabilities do not always align with human preferences. Stronger decoding methods, including Quality Estimation (QE) reranking and Minimum Bayes' Risk (MBR) decoding, have since been proposed to mitigate the model-perplexity-vs-quality mismatch. While these decoding methods achieve state-of-the-art performance, they are prohibitively expensive to compute. In this work, we propose MBR finetuning and QE finetuning which distill the quality gains from these decoding methods at training time, while using an efficient decoding algorithm at inference time. Using the canonical NLG task of Neural Machine Translation (NMT), we show that even with self-training, these finetuning methods significantly outperform the base model. Moreover, when using an external LLM as a teacher model, these finetuning methods outperform finetuning on human-generated references. These findings suggest new ways to leverage monolingual data to achieve improvements in model quality that are on par with, or even exceed, improvements from human-curated data, while maintaining maximum efficiency during decoding.

Key facts. Cited by 33 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2023.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  4. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,475
  5. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  6. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,162
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  8. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 788
  9. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 500
  10. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  11. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 138
  12. 2019Generalization in Generation: A closer look at Exposure Biascited by 123
11 more
  1. 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 123
  2. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 115
  3. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  4. 2019Lingvo: a Modular and Scalable Framework for Sequence-to-Sequence Modelingcited by 86
  5. 2021Sampling-Based Approximations to Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 65
  6. 2023Epsilon Sampling Rocks: Investigating Sampling Strategies for Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Machine Translationcited by 58
  7. 2020Unbabel's Participation in the WMT20 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 56
  8. 2022Quality-Aware Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 49
  9. 2018Denoising Neural Machine Translation Training with Trusted Data and Online Data Selectioncited by 43
  10. 2022Identifying Weaknesses in Machine Translation Metrics Through Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding: A Case Study for COMETcited by 41
  11. 2016Fast Domain Adaptation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 28

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 22; 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

33 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Modelcited by 33
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization for Neural Machine Translation with Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 28
  3. 2024Regularized Best-of-N Sampling with Minimum Bayes Risk Objective for Language Model Alignmentcited by 25
  4. 2024Linear-time Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Reference Aggregationcited by 21
  5. 2024Better Instruction-Following Through Minimum Bayes Riskcited by 19
  6. 2024Mitigating Metric Bias in Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 16
  7. 2024Hyperparameter-Free Approach for Faster Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 15
  8. 2024Regression-aware Inference with LLMscited by 14
  9. 2024AdaCQR: Enhancing Query Reformulation for Conversational Search via Sparse and Dense Retrieval Alignmentcited by 14
  10. 2024Don't Rank, Combine! Combining Machine Translation Hypotheses Using Quality Estimationcited by 13
  11. 2024Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Low-Rank Matrix Completion Algorithmscited by 13
  12. 2023Model-Based Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Text Generationcited by 11
21 more
  1. 2025Uncertainty-Aware Decoding with Minimum Bayes Riskcited by 11
  2. 2024Introducing the NewsPaLM MBR and QE Dataset: LLM-Generated High-Quality Parallel Data Outperforms Traditional Web-Crawled Datacited by 10
  3. 2024Pitfalls and Outlooks in Using COMETcited by 10
  4. 2024Beyond Correlation: Interpretable Evaluation of Machine Translation Metricscited by 10
  5. 2024Don't Throw Away Data: Better Sequence Knowledge Distillationcited by 9
  6. 2024Chasing COMET: Leveraging Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Self-Improving Machine Translationcited by 6
  7. 2024Choose the Final Translation from NMT and LLM hypotheses Using MBR Decoding: HW-TSC's Submission to the WMT24 General MT Shared Taskcited by 4
  8. 2024Is Preference Alignment Always the Best Option to Enhance LLM-Based Translation? An Empirical Analysiscited by 4
  9. 2024Mufu: Multilingual Fused Learning for Low-Resource Translation with LLMcited by 3
  10. 2024Learning from others' mistakes: Finetuning machine translation models with span-level error annotationscited by 3
  11. 2025CRPO: Confidence-Reward Driven Preference Optimization for Machine Translationcited by 3
  12. 2024On the True Distribution Approximation of Minimum Bayes-Risk Decodingcited by 2
  13. 2024A Bayesian Optimization Approach to Machine Translation Rerankingcited by 2
  14. 2024A Context-aware Framework for Translation-mediated Conversationscited by 2
  15. 2025Early-Exit and Instant Confidence Translation Quality Estimationcited by 2
  16. 2026KD4MT: A Survey of Knowledge Distillation for Machine Translationcited by 2
  17. 2025Preliminary Ranking of WMT25 General Machine Translation Systemscited by 1
  18. 2026Consensus Group Relative Policy Optimization for Text Generationcited by 1
  19. 2025Document-Level Text Generation with Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Optimal Transportcited by 0
  20. 2025Multi-Hypothesis Distillation of Multilingual Neural Translation Models for Low-Resource Languagescited by 0
  21. 2026The Anatomy of the CTC Oracle Gap: Acoustic Exhaustion and Linguistic Recoverycited by 0