mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning from others' mistakes: Finetuning machine translation models with span-level error annotations

arXiv 2410.16509 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite growing interest in incorporating feedback to improve language models, most efforts focus only on sequence-level annotations. In this work, we explore the potential of utilizing fine-grained span-level annotations from offline datasets to improve model quality. We develop a simple finetuning algorithm, called Training with Annotations (TWA), to directly train machine translation models on such annotated data. TWA utilizes targeted span-level error information while also flexibly learning what to penalize within a span. Moreover, TWA considers the overall trajectory of a sequence when deciding which non-error spans to utilize as positive signals. Experiments on English-German and Chinese-English machine translation show that TWA outperforms baselines such as Supervised FineTuning on sequences filtered for quality and Direct Preference Optimization on pairs constructed from the same data.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2024.

Builds on

18 of 25 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
  6. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  8. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
  9. 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 686
  10. 2023Reinforced Self-Training (ReST) for Language Modelingcited by 500
  11. 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 401
  12. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
6 more
  1. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  2. 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 291
  3. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  4. 2022Quality-Aware Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 49
  5. 2023MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methodscited by 33
  6. 2024Towards Minimal Targeted Updates of Language Models with Targeted Negative Trainingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025TranslationCorrect: A Unified Framework for Machine Translation Post-Editing with Predictive Error Assistance
  2. 2024MT-PATCHER: Selective and Extendable Knowledge Distillation from Large Language Models for Machine Translation
  3. 2025Bridging the Linguistic Divide: A Survey on Leveraging Large Language Models for Machine Translation
  4. 2024What do Large Language Models Need for Machine Translation Evaluation?
  5. 2026Unlocking Fine-Grained Translation Quality Estimation in LRMs through Mutually Boosting Implicit and Explicit Reasoning
  6. 2022Improving Neural Machine Translation by Denoising Training
  7. 2024A Preference-driven Paradigm for Enhanced Translation with Large Language Models
  8. 2026Why do Large Language Models Fail in Low-resource Translation? Unraveling the Token Dynamics of Large Language Models for Machine Translation