mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Bayesian Optimization Approach to Machine Translation Reranking

arXiv 2411.09694 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reranking a list of candidates from a machine translation system with an external scoring model and returning the highest-scoring candidate remains a simple and effective method for improving the overall output quality. Translation scoring models continue to grow in size, with the best models being comparable to generation models. Thus, reranking can add substantial computational cost to the translation pipeline. In this work, we pose reranking as a Bayesian optimization (BayesOpt) problem. By strategically selecting candidates to score based on a balance of exploration and exploitation, we show that it is possible to find top-scoring candidates when scoring only a fraction of the candidate list. For instance, our method achieves the same CometKiwi score using only 70 scoring evaluations compared a baseline system using 180. We present a multi-fidelity setting for BayesOpt, where the candidates are first scored with a cheaper but noisier proxy scoring model, which further improves the cost-performance tradeoff when using smaller but well-trained distilled proxy scorers.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2024.

Builds on

25 of 50 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  2. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  3. 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
  4. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  5. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  6. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  7. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 791
  8. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 137
  9. 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 121
  10. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  11. 2019Practical Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 91
  12. 2021Sampling-Based Approximations to Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 63
13 more
  1. 2022SummaReranker: A Multi-Task Mixture-of-Experts Re-ranking Framework for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 61
  2. 2023Epsilon Sampling Rocks: Investigating Sampling Strategies for Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Machine Translationcited by 57
  3. 2020Energy-Based Reranking: Improving Neural Machine Translation Using Energy-Based Modelscited by 44
  4. 2019Simple and Effective Noisy Channel Modeling for Neural Machine Translationcited by 37
  5. 2023Faster Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Confidence-based Pruningcited by 34
  6. 2023MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methodscited by 33
  7. 2024Linear-time Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Reference Aggregationcited by 21
  8. 2024Don't Rank, Combine! Combining Machine Translation Hypotheses Using Quality Estimationcited by 13
  9. 2024Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Low-Rank Matrix Completion Algorithmscited by 13
  10. 2024Centroid-Based Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 12
  11. 2022Exact Gaussian Processes for Massive Datasets via Non-Stationary Sparsity-Discovering Kernelscited by 9
  12. 2024Don't Throw Away Data: Better Sequence Knowledge Distillationcited by 9
  13. 2023EEL: Efficiently Encoding Lattices for Rerankingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.