mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding using Low-Rank Matrix Completion Algorithms

arXiv 2406.02832 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2024cs.CL cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding is a powerful decoding strategy widely used for text generation tasks, but its quadratic computational complexity limits its practical application. This paper presents a novel approach for approximating MBR decoding using matrix completion techniques, focusing on the task of machine translation. We formulate MBR decoding as a matrix completion problem, where the utility metric scores between candidate hypotheses and pseudo-reference translations form a low-rank matrix. First, we empirically show that the scores matrices indeed have a low-rank structure. Then, we exploit this by only computing a random subset of the scores and efficiently recover the missing entries in the matrix by applying the Alternating Least Squares (ALS) algorithm, thereby enabling a fast approximation of the MBR decoding process. Our experimental results on machine translation tasks demonstrate that the proposed method requires 1/16 utility metric computations compared to vanilla MBR decoding while achieving equal translation quality measured by COMET22 on the WMT22 dataset (en<>de and en<>ru). We also benchmark our method against other approximation methods and we show gains in quality when comparing to them.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2024.

Builds on

22 of 39 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  2. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  3. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  6. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
  7. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 137
  8. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  9. 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 121
  10. 2020BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocentcited by 109
  11. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  12. 2021Sampling-Based Approximations to Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Neural Machine Translationcited by 63
10 more
  1. 2023Epsilon Sampling Rocks: Investigating Sampling Strategies for Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Machine Translationcited by 57
  2. 2021Understanding the Properties of Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding in Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
  3. 2019Low-Rank Matrix Completion: A Contemporary Surveycited by 43
  4. 2022Identifying Weaknesses in Machine Translation Metrics Through Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding: A Case Study for COMETcited by 41
  5. 2023Faster Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Confidence-based Pruningcited by 34
  6. 2023MBR and QE Finetuning: Training-time Distillation of the Best and Most Expensive Decoding Methodscited by 33
  7. 2024Linear-time Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Reference Aggregationcited by 21
  8. 2024Hyperparameter-Free Approach for Faster Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 15
  9. 2023Training and Meta-Evaluating Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics at the Paragraph Levelcited by 9
  10. 2023Quality-Aware Translation Models: Efficient Generation and Quality Estimation in a Single Modelcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: