mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mitigating Noisy Correspondence by Geometrical Structure Consistency Learning

arXiv 2405.16996 ↗First posted 27 May 2024cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Noisy correspondence that refers to mismatches in cross-modal data pairs, is prevalent on human-annotated or web-crawled datasets. Prior approaches to leverage such data mainly consider the application of uni-modal noisy label learning without amending the impact on both cross-modal and intra-modal geometrical structures in multimodal learning. Actually, we find that both structures are effective to discriminate noisy correspondence through structural differences when being well-established. Inspired by this observation, we introduce a Geometrical Structure Consistency (GSC) method to infer the true correspondence. Specifically, GSC ensures the preservation of geometrical structures within and between modalities, allowing for the accurate discrimination of noisy samples based on structural differences. Utilizing these inferred true correspondence labels, GSC refines the learning of geometrical structures by filtering out the noisy samples. Experiments across four cross-modal datasets confirm that GSC effectively identifies noisy samples and significantly outperforms the current leading methods.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.

Builds on

27 of 45 references.

References · 27

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  4. 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,013
  5. 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 968
  6. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  7. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  8. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  9. 2022Multimodal Learning with Transformers: A Surveycited by 400
  10. 2022MultiMAE: Multi-modal Multi-task Masked Autoencoderscited by 291
  11. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 145
  12. 2022CyCLIP: Cyclic Contrastive Language-Image Pretrainingcited by 127
15 more
  1. 2022Modality Competition: What Makes Joint Training of Multi-modal Network Fail in Deep Learning? (Provably)cited by 122
  2. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  3. 2018Recipe1M+: A Dataset for Learning Cross-Modal Embeddings for Cooking Recipes and Food Imagescited by 118
  4. 2018Efficient Large-Scale Multi-Modal Classificationcited by 57
  5. 2023Understanding and Constructing Latent Modality Structures in Multi-modal Representation Learningcited by 53
  6. 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
  7. 2022Robust Contrastive Learning against Noisy Viewscited by 45
  8. 2022Improving Zero-shot Generalization and Robustness of Multi-modal Modelscited by 45
  9. 2023Exposing and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 36
  10. 2022COTS: Collaborative Two-Stream Vision-Language Pre-Training Model for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 33
  11. 2023BiCro: Noisy Correspondence Rectification for Multi-modality Data via Bi-directional Cross-modal Similarity Consistencycited by 27
  12. 2022Contrastive Learning with Boosted Memorizationcited by 26
  13. 2023Noisy Correspondence Learning with Meta Similarity Correctioncited by 26
  14. 2023Combating Representation Learning Disparity with Geometric Harmonizationcited by 11
  15. 2023Latent Class-Conditional Noise Modelcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

10 papers.