mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graphix-T5: Mixing Pre-Trained Transformers with Graph-Aware Layers for Text-to-SQL Parsing

arXiv 2301.07507 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2023cs.CL cs.DBcited by 93

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The task of text-to-SQL parsing, which aims at converting natural language questions into executable SQL queries, has garnered increasing attention in recent years, as it can assist end users in efficiently extracting vital information from databases without the need for technical background. One of the major challenges in text-to-SQL parsing is domain generalization, i.e., how to generalize well to unseen databases. Recently, the pre-trained text-to-text transformer model, namely T5, though not specialized for text-to-SQL parsing, has achieved state-of-the-art performance on standard benchmarks targeting domain generalization. In this work, we explore ways to further augment the pre-trained T5 model with specialized components for text-to-SQL parsing. Such components are expected to introduce structural inductive bias into text-to-SQL parsers thus improving model's capacity on (potentially multi-hop) reasoning, which is critical for generating structure-rich SQLs. To this end, we propose a new architecture GRAPHIX-T5, a mixed model with the standard pre-trained transformer model augmented by some specially-designed graph-aware layers. Extensive experiments and analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of GRAPHIX-T5 across four text-to-SQL benchmarks: SPIDER, SYN, REALISTIC and DK. GRAPHIX-T5 surpass all other T5-based parsers with a significant margin, achieving new state-of-the-art performance. Notably, GRAPHIX-T5-large reach performance superior to the original T5-large by 5.7% on exact match (EM) accuracy and 6.6% on execution accuracy (EX). This even outperforms the T5-3B by 1.2% on EM and 1.5% on EX.

Key facts. Cited by 93 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2023.

Builds on

40 of 50 references.

References · 40

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  5. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  6. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 905
  7. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 687
  8. 2019Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological Viewcited by 545
  9. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
  10. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 424
  11. 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 411
  12. 2018The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questionscited by 410
28 more
  1. 2022UnifiedSKG: Unifying and Multi-Tasking Structured Knowledge Grounding with Text-to-Text Language Modelscited by 231
  2. 2019Towards Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representationcited by 210
  3. 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
  4. 2020DART: Open-Domain Structured Data Record to Text Generationcited by 145
  5. 2017SQLNet: Generating Structured Queries From Natural Language Without Reinforcement Learningcited by 135
  6. 2021LGESQL: Line Graph Enhanced Text-to-SQL Model with Mixed Local and Non-Local Relationscited by 119
  7. 2021Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitutioncited by 110
  8. 2020Relational Graph Attention Network for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysiscited by 104
  9. 2017Learning a Neural Semantic Parser from User Feedbackcited by 99
  10. 2020SmBoP: Semi-autoregressive Bottom-up Semantic Parsingcited by 97
  11. 2021Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalizationcited by 92
  12. 2022RASAT: Integrating Relational Structures into Pretrained Seq2Seq Model for Text-to-SQLcited by 85
  13. 2019Hierarchical Graph Network for Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 83
  14. 2018TypeSQL: Knowledge-based Type-Aware Neural Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 81
  15. 2020Grounded Adaptation for Zero-shot Executable Semantic Parsingcited by 76
  16. 2019Representing Schema Structure with Graph Neural Networks for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 74
  17. 2021Natural SQL: Making SQL Easier to Infer from Natural Language Specificationscited by 68
  18. 2022A Survey on Text-to-SQL Parsing: Concepts, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 52
  19. 2021SADGA: Structure-Aware Dual Graph Aggregation Network for Text-to-SQLcited by 43
  20. 2022S2SQL: Injecting Syntax to Question-Schema Interaction Graph Encoder for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 41
  21. 2021ShadowGNN: Graph Projection Neural Network for Text-to-SQL Parsercited by 35
  22. 2022Proton: Probing Schema Linking Information from Pre-trained Language Models for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 30
  23. 2021Improving Text-to-SQL with Schema Dependency Learningcited by 25
  24. 2017An Encoder-Decoder Framework Translating Natural Language to Database Queriescited by 23
  25. 2022STAR: SQL Guided Pre-Training for Context-dependent Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 19
  26. 2021Dynamic Hybrid Relation Network for Cross-Domain Context-Dependent Semantic Parsingcited by 15
  27. 2022SUN: Exploring Intrinsic Uncertainties in Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 7
  28. 2021Linking-Enhanced Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 20; 2024: 42; 2025: 24; 2026: 7.

93 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 988
  2. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
  3. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 477
  4. 2023Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluationcited by 385
  5. 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 187
  6. 2023C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPTcited by 164
  7. 2024Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Surveycited by 159
  8. 2024CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQLcited by 138
  9. 2024Next-Generation Database Interfaces: A Survey of LLM-based Text-to-SQLcited by 120
  10. 2024MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 105
  11. 2025VerlTool: Towards Holistic Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Tool Usecited by 96
  12. 2025OmniSQL: Synthesizing High-quality Text-to-SQL Data at Scalecited by 91
38 more
  1. 2024TableGPT2: A Large Multimodal Model with Tabular Data Integrationcited by 72
  2. 2023ACT-SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically-Generated Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 65
  3. 2023TableGPT: Towards Unifying Tables, Nature Language and Commands into One GPTcited by 59
  4. 2023How to Prompt LLMs for Text-to-SQL: A Study in Zero-shot, Single-domain, and Cross-domain Settingscited by 58
  5. 2024A Survey of Text-to-SQL in the Era of LLMs: Where are we, and where are we going?cited by 56
  6. 2024Synthesizing Text-to-SQL Data from Weak and Strong LLMscited by 54
  7. 2024Before Generation, Align it! A Novel and Effective Strategy for Mitigating Hallucinations in Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 50
  8. 2024DTS-SQL: Decomposed Text-to-SQL with Small Large Language Modelscited by 45
  9. 2024FinSQL: Model-Agnostic LLMs-based Text-to-SQL Framework for Financial Analysiscited by 36
  10. 2024Knowledge-to-SQL: Enhancing SQL Generation with Data Expert LLMcited by 35
  11. 2024PURPLE: Making a Large Language Model a Better SQL Writercited by 34
  12. 2023Evaluating Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Models and Benchmarkscited by 32
  13. 2023TAP4LLM: Table Provider on Sampling, Augmenting, and Packing Semi-structured Data for Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 32
  14. 2024SQLBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation for Text-to-SQL Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 32
  15. 2024Graph Transformers: A Surveycited by 32
  16. 2024Decomposition for Enhancing Attention: Improving LLM-based Text-to-SQL through Workflow Paradigmcited by 31
  17. 2023Natural Language Interfaces for Tabular Data Querying and Visualization: A Surveycited by 27
  18. 2023Divide and Prompt: Chain of Thought Prompting for Text-to-SQLcited by 20
  19. 2025Reliable Text-to-SQL with Adaptive Abstentioncited by 20
  20. 2023Interactive Text-to-SQL Generation via Editable Step-by-Step Explanationscited by 19
  21. 2025BIRD-INTERACT: Re-imagining Text-to-SQL Evaluation for Large Language Models via Lens of Dynamic Interactionscited by 19
  22. 2024Triad: A Framework Leveraging a Multi-Role LLM-based Agent to Solve Knowledge Base Question Answeringcited by 18
  23. 2023Prompting GPT-3.5 for Text-to-SQL with De-semanticization and Skeleton Retrievalcited by 16
  24. 2024Improving Retrieval-augmented Text-to-SQL with AST-based Ranking and Schema Pruningcited by 16
  25. 2025SHARE: An SLM-based Hierarchical Action CorREction Assistant for Text-to-SQLcited by 16
  26. 2025Understanding, Detecting, and Repairing Real-World In-Context-Learning-Based Text-to-SQL Errorscited by 14
  27. 2024Archer: A Human-Labeled Text-to-SQL Dataset with Arithmetic, Commonsense and Hypothetical Reasoningcited by 13
  28. 2024ROUTE: Robust Multitask Tuning and Collaboration for Text-to-SQLcited by 13
  29. 2023Retrieval-augmented GPT-3.5-based Text-to-SQL Framework with Sample-aware Prompting and Dynamic Revision Chaincited by 12
  30. 2024Evaluating the Data Model Robustness of Text-to-SQL Systems Based on Real User Queriescited by 12
  31. 2024SQL-to-Schema Enhances Schema Linking in Text-to-SQLcited by 12
  32. 2024SQLFixAgent: Towards Semantic-Accurate Text-to-SQL Parsing via Consistency-Enhanced Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 11
  33. 2024FLEX: Expert-level False-Less EXecution Metric for Reliable Text-to-SQL Benchmarkcited by 11
  34. 2023DBCopilot: Natural Language Querying over Massive Databases via Schema Routingcited by 10
  35. 2023Reboost Large Language Model-based Text-to-SQL, Text-to-Python, and Text-to-Function -- with Real Applications in Traffic Domaincited by 9
  36. 2024Structure Guided Large Language Model for SQL Generationcited by 9
  37. 2024SynTQA: Synergistic Table-based Question Answering via Mixture of Text-to-SQL and E2E TQAcited by 9
  38. 2024STGformer: Efficient Spatiotemporal Graph Transformer for Traffic Forecastingcited by 9

50 most cited of 93 All 93 (JSON)