CoreGuard: Safeguarding Foundational Capabilities of LLMs Against Model Stealing in Edge Deployment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Proprietary large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong generalization capabilities across diverse tasks and are increasingly deployed on edge devices for efficiency and privacy reasons. However, deploying proprietary LLMs at the edge without adequate protection introduces critical security threats. Attackers can extract model weights and architectures, enabling unauthorized copying and misuse. Even when protective measures prevent full extraction of model weights, attackers may still perform advanced attacks, such as fine-tuning, to further exploit the model. Existing defenses against these threats typically incur significant computational and communication overhead, making them impractical for edge deployment. To safeguard the edge-deployed LLMs, we introduce CoreGuard, a computation- and communication-efficient protection method. CoreGuard employs an efficient protection protocol to reduce computational overhead and minimize communication overhead via a propagation protocol. Extensive experiments show that CoreGuard achieves upper-bound security protection with negligible overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2024.
Builds on
31 of 63 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,288
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
- 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,031
- 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 939
19 more
- 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 357
- 2020LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attentioncited by 326
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 292
- 2020Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extractioncited by 149
- 2021LGESQL: Line Graph Enhanced Text-to-SQL Model with Mixed Local and Non-Local Relationscited by 119
- 2018Slalom: Fast, Verifiable and Private Execution of Neural Networks in Trusted Hardwarecited by 102
- 2023Graphix-T5: Mixing Pre-Trained Transformers with Graph-Aware Layers for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 93
- 2023Offsite-Tuning: Transfer Learning without Full Modelcited by 78
- 2020DarkneTZ: Towards Model Privacy at the Edge using Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 58
- 2020ShadowNet: A Secure and Efficient On-device Model Inference System for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2023No Privacy Left Outside: On the (In-)Security of TEE-Shielded DNN Partition for On-Device MLcited by 21
- 2023NNSplitter: An Active Defense Solution for DNN Model via Automated Weight Obfuscationcited by 16
- 2020Serdab: An IoT Framework for Partitioning Neural Networks Computation across Multiple Enclavescited by 11
- 2023Boosting Neural Networks to Decompile Optimized Binariescited by 11
- 2024TransLinkGuard: Safeguarding Transformer Models Against Model Stealing in Edge Deploymentcited by 11
- 2020GuardNN: Secure Accelerator Architecture for Privacy-Preserving Deep Learningcited by 9
- 2024Confidential Computing on NVIDIA Hopper GPUs: A Performance Benchmark Studycited by 8
- 2019HybCache: Hybrid Side-Channel-Resilient Caches for Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 2
- 2023Making Your Program Oblivious: a Comparative Study for Side-channel-safe Confidential Computingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2025Activation Functions Considered Harmful: Recovering Neural Network Weights through Controlled Channelscited by 2
- 2025Spill The Beans: Exploiting CPU Cache Side-Channels to Leak Tokens from Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025CryptoTensors: A Light-Weight Large Language Model File Format for Highly-Secure Model Distributioncited by 0
- 2026The Safeguard Worked. Is the LLM System Safer?cited by 0
- 2026The Safeguard Worked. Is the LLM System Safer?1 Sep 2026
- 2025CryptoTensors: A Light-Weight Large Language Model File Format for Highly-Secure Model Distribution4 Dec 2025
- 2025A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models26 Jun 2025
- 2025Spill The Beans: Exploiting CPU Cache Side-Channels to Leak Tokens from Large Language Models1 May 2025
- 2025Activation Functions Considered Harmful: Recovering Neural Network Weights through Controlled Channels24 Mar 2025