mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Filling Memory Gaps: Enhancing Continual Semantic Parsing via SQL Syntax Variance-Guided LLMs without Real Data Replay

arXiv 2412.07246 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2024cs.CL cs.DBcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual Semantic Parsing (CSP) aims to train parsers to convert natural language questions into SQL across tasks with limited annotated examples, adapting to the real-world scenario of dynamically updated databases. Previous studies mitigate this challenge by replaying historical data or employing parameter-efficient tuning (PET), but they often violate data privacy or rely on ideal continual learning settings. To address these problems, we propose a new Large Language Model (LLM)-Enhanced Continuous Semantic Parsing method, named LECSP, which alleviates forgetting while encouraging generalization, without requiring real data replay or ideal settings. Specifically, it first analyzes the commonalities and differences between tasks from the SQL syntax perspective to guide LLMs in reconstructing key memories and improving memory accuracy through a calibration strategy. Then, it uses a task-aware dual-teacher distillation framework to promote the accumulation and transfer of knowledge during sequential training. Experimental results on two CSP benchmarks show that our method significantly outperforms existing methods, even those utilizing data replay or ideal settings. Additionally, we achieve generalization performance beyond the upper limits, better adapting to unseen tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2024.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  2. 2023Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debugcited by 963
  3. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
  4. 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 890
  5. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 710
  6. 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 465
  7. 2019Episodic Memory in Lifelong Language Learningcited by 188
  8. 2024CodeS: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Text-to-SQLcited by 183
  9. 2020GraPPa: Grammar-Augmented Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 171
  10. 2023ChatDB: Augmenting LLMs with Databases as Their Symbolic Memorycited by 136
  11. 2020Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-SQL with Distilled Test Suitescited by 123
  12. 2021LFPT5: A Unified Framework for Lifelong Few-shot Language Learning Based on Prompt Tuning of T5cited by 103
9 more
  1. 2023Graphix-T5: Mixing Pre-Trained Transformers with Graph-Aware Layers for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 93
  2. 2022Memory Replay with Data Compression for Continual Learningcited by 80
  3. 2019Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic Intelligencecited by 78
  4. 2023How to Prompt LLMs for Text-to-SQL: A Study in Zero-shot, Single-domain, and Cross-domain Settingscited by 57
  5. 2023Incorporating Neuro-Inspired Adaptability for Continual Learning in Artificial Intelligencecited by 43
  6. 2021Self-Supervised Learning for Semi-Supervised Temporal Action Proposalcited by 39
  7. 2022UniSAr: A Unified Structure-Aware Autoregressive Language Model for Text-to-SQLcited by 20
  8. 2022STAR: SQL Guided Pre-Training for Context-dependent Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 19
  9. 2024Improving Demonstration Diversity by Human-Free Fusing for Text-to-SQLcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.