Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyond
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pretraining-based (PT-based) automatic evaluation metrics (e.g., BERTScore and BARTScore) have been widely used in several sentence generation tasks (e.g., machine translation and text summarization) due to their better correlation with human judgments over traditional overlap-based methods. Although PT-based methods have become the de facto standard for training grammatical error correction (GEC) systems, GEC evaluation still does not benefit from pretrained knowledge. This paper takes the first step towards understanding and improving GEC evaluation with pretraining. We first find that arbitrarily applying PT-based metrics to GEC evaluation brings unsatisfactory correlation results because of the excessive attention to inessential systems outputs (e.g., unchanged parts). To alleviate the limitation, we propose a novel GEC evaluation metric to achieve the best of both worlds, namely PT-M2 which only uses PT-based metrics to score those corrected parts. Experimental results on the CoNLL14 evaluation task show that PT-M2 significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving a new state-of-the-art result of 0.949 Pearson correlation. Further analysis reveals that PT-M2 is robust to evaluate competitive GEC systems. Source code and scripts are freely available at https://github.com/pygongnlp/PT-M2.
Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2022.
Builds on
29 of 44 references.
References · 29
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
- 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
- 2020GECToR -- Grammatical Error Correction: Tag, Not Rewritecited by 177
- 2020A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systemscited by 164
- 2020Encoder-Decoder Models Can Benefit from Pre-trained Masked Language Models in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 59
17 more
- 2020Seq2Edits: Sequence Transduction Using Span-level Edit Operationscited by 58
- 2018A Multilayer Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Neural Network for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 36
- 2020On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 36
- 2020Stronger Baselines for Grammatical Error Correction Using Pretrained Encoder-Decoder Modelcited by 33
- 2020Understanding and Improving Encoder Layer Fusion in Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 26
- 2022ODE Transformer: An Ordinary Differential Equation-Inspired Model for Sequence Generationcited by 26
- 2016There's No Comparison: Reference-less Evaluation Metrics in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 18
- 2022USCORE: An Effective Approach to Fully Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 15
- 2022Ensembling and Knowledge Distilling of Large Sequence Taggers for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 12
- 2020Classifying Syntactic Errors in Learner Languagecited by 11
- 2022Type-Driven Multi-Turn Corrections for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 9
- 2022BLISS: Robust Sequence-to-Sequence Learning via Self-Supervised Input Representationcited by 8
- 2020KoBE: Knowledge-Based Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 6
- 2021Grammatical Error Correction as GAN-like Sequence Labelingcited by 6
- 2021Difficulty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 6
- 2021BEAMetrics: A Benchmark for Language Generation Evaluation Evaluationcited by 6
- 2021Variance-Aware Machine Translation Test Setscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 6; 2026: 5.
18 papers.
Sort:
- 2023ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmarkcited by 77
- 2023CoAScore: Chain-of-Aspects Prompting for NLG Evaluationcited by 14
- 2023Beyond English: Evaluating LLMs for Arabic Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 12
- 2025gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluationcited by 9
- 2025Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human?cited by 7
- 2023CLEME: Debiasing Multi-reference Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 5
- 2023ChatGPT for Arabic Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 5
- 2024Revisiting Meta-evaluation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 3
- 2024Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 2
- 2025IMPARA-GED: Grammatical Error Detection is Boosting Reference-free Grammatical Error Quality Estimatorcited by 2
- 2025Leveraging What's Overfixed: Post-Correction via LLM Grammatical Error Overcorrectioncited by 2
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of LLMs for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 1
6 more
- 2026Edit-level Majority Voting Mitigates Over-Correction in LLM-based Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 1
- 2025Time Is Effort: Estimating Human Post-Editing Time for Grammar Error Correction Tool Evaluationcited by 0
- 2025JELV: A Judge of Edit-Level Validity for Evaluation and Automated Reference Expansion in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 0
- 2026Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation by Optimally Transporting Edit Representationcited by 0
- 2026Scoring Edit Impact in Grammatical Error Correction via Embedded Association Graphscited by 0
- 2026Don't Count the Edits, Judge by the Outcome Alone: Reward-Based Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 0
- 2026Don't Count the Edits, Judge by the Outcome Alone: Reward-Based Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction14 Sep 2026
- 2026Edit-level Majority Voting Mitigates Over-Correction in LLM-based Grammatical Error Correction13 May 2026
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of LLMs for Grammatical Error Correction8 May 2026
- 2026Scoring Edit Impact in Grammatical Error Correction via Embedded Association Graphs8 Apr 2026
- 2026Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation by Optimally Transporting Edit Representation5 Feb 2026
- 2025JELV: A Judge of Edit-Level Validity for Evaluation and Automated Reference Expansion in Grammatical Error Correction16 Nov 2025
- 2025Time Is Effort: Estimating Human Post-Editing Time for Grammar Error Correction Tool Evaluation5 Oct 2025
- 2025Leveraging What's Overfixed: Post-Correction via LLM Grammatical Error Overcorrection25 Sep 2025
- 2025IMPARA-GED: Grammatical Error Detection is Boosting Reference-free Grammatical Error Quality Estimator3 Jun 2025
- 2025gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation26 May 2025
- 2025Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human?13 Feb 2025
- 2024Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correction26 Mar 2024
6 more
- 2024Revisiting Meta-evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction5 Mar 2024
- 2023CoAScore: Chain-of-Aspects Prompting for NLG Evaluation16 Dec 2023
- 2023Beyond English: Evaluating LLMs for Arabic Grammatical Error Correction13 Dec 2023
- 2023ChatGPT for Arabic Grammatical Error Correction8 Aug 2023
- 2023CLEME: Debiasing Multi-reference Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction18 May 2023
- 2023ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmark15 Mar 2023
- 2023ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmarkcited by 77
- 2023CoAScore: Chain-of-Aspects Prompting for NLG Evaluationcited by 14
- 2023Beyond English: Evaluating LLMs for Arabic Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 12
- 2025gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluationcited by 9
- 2025Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human?cited by 7
- 2023CLEME: Debiasing Multi-reference Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 5
- 2023ChatGPT for Arabic Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 5
- 2024Revisiting Meta-evaluation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 3
- 2024Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 2
- 2025IMPARA-GED: Grammatical Error Detection is Boosting Reference-free Grammatical Error Quality Estimatorcited by 2
- 2025Leveraging What's Overfixed: Post-Correction via LLM Grammatical Error Overcorrectioncited by 2
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of LLMs for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 1
12 most cited of 18 All 18 (JSON)
- 2026Don't Count the Edits, Judge by the Outcome Alone: Reward-Based Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction14 Sep 2026
- 2026Edit-level Majority Voting Mitigates Over-Correction in LLM-based Grammatical Error Correction13 May 2026
- 2026Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of LLMs for Grammatical Error Correction8 May 2026
- 2026Scoring Edit Impact in Grammatical Error Correction via Embedded Association Graphs8 Apr 2026
- 2026Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation by Optimally Transporting Edit Representation5 Feb 2026
- 2025JELV: A Judge of Edit-Level Validity for Evaluation and Automated Reference Expansion in Grammatical Error Correction16 Nov 2025
- 2025Time Is Effort: Estimating Human Post-Editing Time for Grammar Error Correction Tool Evaluation5 Oct 2025
- 2025Leveraging What's Overfixed: Post-Correction via LLM Grammatical Error Overcorrection25 Sep 2025
- 2025IMPARA-GED: Grammatical Error Detection is Boosting Reference-free Grammatical Error Quality Estimator3 Jun 2025
- 2025gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation26 May 2025
- 2025Rethinking Evaluation Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction: Why Use a Different Evaluation Process than Human?13 Feb 2025
- 2024Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluator for Grammatical Error Correction26 Mar 2024
12 newest of 18 All 18 (JSON)