mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

USCORE: An Effective Approach to Fully Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation

arXiv 2202.10062 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2022cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The vast majority of evaluation metrics for machine translation are supervised, i.e., (i) are trained on human scores, (ii) assume the existence of reference translations, or (iii) leverage parallel data. This hinders their applicability to cases where such supervision signals are not available. In this work, we develop fully unsupervised evaluation metrics. To do so, we leverage similarities and synergies between evaluation metric induction, parallel corpus mining, and MT systems. In particular, we use an unsupervised evaluation metric to mine pseudo-parallel data, which we use to remap deficient underlying vector spaces (in an iterative manner) and to induce an unsupervised MT system, which then provides pseudo-references as an additional component in the metric. Finally, we also induce unsupervised multilingual sentence embeddings from pseudo-parallel data. We show that our fully unsupervised metrics are effective, i.e., they beat supervised competitors on 4 out of our 5 evaluation datasets. We make our code publicly available.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2022.

Builds on

49 of 82 references.

References · 49

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  6. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
  7. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
  8. 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 621
  9. 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 591
  10. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
  11. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
  12. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
37 more
  1. 2019WikiMatrix: Mining 135M Parallel Sentences in 1620 Language Pairs from Wikipediacited by 221
  2. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
  3. 2013Exploiting Similarities among Languages for Machine Translationcited by 187
  4. 2021Word Alignment by Fine-tuning Embeddings on Parallel Corporacited by 186
  5. 2020Theoretical Analysis of Self-Training with Deep Networks on Unlabeled Datacited by 179
  6. 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 155
  7. 2019Revisiting Self-Training for Neural Sequence Generationcited by 154
  8. 2017Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 148
  9. 2018Phrase-Based & Neural Unsupervised Machine Translationcited by 138
  10. 2020Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation in Many Languages via Zero-Shot Paraphrasingcited by 114
  11. 2020Multilingual Alignment of Contextual Word Representationscited by 113
  12. 2021Neural Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Surveycited by 108
  13. 2020Extending Multilingual BERT to Low-Resource Languagescited by 88
  14. 2018Margin-based Parallel Corpus Mining with Multilingual Sentence Embeddingscited by 83
  15. 2019Better Rewards Yield Better Summaries: Learning to Summarise Without Referencescited by 76
  16. 2021Scientific Credibility of Machine Translation Research: A Meta-Evaluation of 769 Paperscited by 70
  17. 2019Cross-Lingual Alignment of Contextual Word Embeddings, with Applications to Zero-shot Dependency Parsingcited by 69
  18. 2020SUPERT: Towards New Frontiers in Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 69
  19. 2019Attenuating Bias in Word Vectorscited by 64
  20. 2020TransQuest: Translation Quality Estimation with Cross-lingual Transformerscited by 59
  21. 2019Improving Multilingual Sentence Embedding using Bi-directional Dual Encoder with Additive Margin Softmaxcited by 58
  22. 2020Cross-lingual Retrieval for Iterative Self-Supervised Trainingcited by 54
  23. 2020MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Datasetcited by 47
  24. 2018Effective Parallel Corpus Mining using Bilingual Sentence Embeddingscited by 39
  25. 2020When Does Unsupervised Machine Translation Work?cited by 38
  26. 2021Automatic Text Evaluation through the Lens of Wasserstein Barycenterscited by 38
  27. 2019An Effective Approach to Unsupervised Machine Translationcited by 37
  28. 2020On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 36
  29. 2022DiscoScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT and Discourse Coherencecited by 35
  30. 2021The Eval4NLP Shared Task on Explainable Quality Estimation: Overview and Resultscited by 27
  31. 2021Global Explainability of BERT-Based Evaluation Metrics by Disentangling along Linguistic Factorscited by 25
  32. 2020TransQuest at WMT2020: Sentence-Level Direct Assessmentcited by 20
  33. 2021FrugalScore: Learning Cheaper, Lighter and Faster Evaluation Metricsfor Automatic Text Generationcited by 19
  34. 2021An Exploratory Analysis of Multilingual Word-Level Quality Estimation with Cross-Lingual Transformerscited by 18
  35. 2020Unsupervised Bitext Mining and Translation via Self-trained Contextual Embeddingscited by 16
  36. 2019Should All Cross-Lingual Embeddings Speak English?cited by 14
  37. 2021Unsupervised Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Parallel Corpus Miningcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 7; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

15 papers.

Sort: