mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Leveraging What's Overfixed: Post-Correction via LLM Grammatical Error Overcorrection

arXiv 2509.20811 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robust supervised fine-tuned small Language Models (sLMs) often show high reliability but tend to undercorrect. They achieve high precision at the cost of low recall. Conversely, Large Language Models (LLMs) often show the opposite tendency, making excessive overcorrection, leading to low precision. To effectively harness the strengths of LLMs to address the recall challenges in sLMs, we propose Post-Correction via Overcorrection (PoCO), a novel approach that strategically balances recall and precision. PoCO first intentionally triggers overcorrection via LLM to maximize recall by allowing comprehensive revisions, then applies a targeted post-correction step via fine-tuning smaller models to identify and refine erroneous outputs. We aim to harmonize both aspects by leveraging the generative power of LLMs while preserving the reliability of smaller supervised models. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that PoCO effectively balances GEC performance by increasing recall with competitive precision, ultimately improving the overall quality of grammatical error correction.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

Builds on

22 of 45 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  3. 2020GECToR -- Grammatical Error Correction: Tag, Not Rewritecited by 177
  4. 2021A Simple Recipe for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 108
  5. 2019Encode, Tag, Realize: High-Precision Text Editingcited by 99
  6. 2023Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 97
  7. 2019Parallel Iterative Edit Models for Local Sequence Transductioncited by 81
  8. 2023ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmarkcited by 77
  9. 2020Seq2Edits: Sequence Transduction Using Span-level Edit Operationscited by 58
  10. 2018Approaching Neural Grammatical Error Correction as a Low-Resource Machine Translation Taskcited by 56
  11. 2021Synthetic Data Generation for Grammatical Error Correction with Tagged Corruption Modelscited by 56
  12. 2020Stronger Baselines for Grammatical Error Correction Using Pretrained Encoder-Decoder Modelcited by 33
10 more
  1. 2021LM-Critic: Language Models for Unsupervised Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 33
  2. 2016Neural Language Correction with Character-Based Attentioncited by 18
  3. 2022Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyondcited by 18
  4. 2024GPT-3.5 for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 18
  5. 2017A Nested Attention Neural Hybrid Model for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 12
  6. 2024Evaluating Prompting Strategies for Grammatical Error Correction Based on Language Proficiencycited by 9
  7. 2023Non-autoregressive Text Editing with Copy-aware Latent Alignmentscited by 8
  8. 2024Key-Element-Informed sLLM Tuning for Document Summarizationcited by 8
  9. 2024Alirector: Alignment-Enhanced Chinese Grammatical Error Correctorcited by 5
  10. 2024Efficient and Interpretable Grammatical Error Correction with Mixture of Expertscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.