Variance-Aware Machine Translation Test Sets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We release 70 small and discriminative test sets for machine translation (MT) evaluation called variance-aware test sets (VAT), covering 35 translation directions from WMT16 to WMT20 competitions. VAT is automatically created by a novel variance-aware filtering method that filters the indiscriminative test instances of the current MT test sets without any human labor. Experimental results show that VAT outperforms the original WMT test sets in terms of the correlation with human judgement across mainstream language pairs and test sets. Further analysis on the properties of VAT reveals the challenging linguistic features (e.g., translation of low-frequency words and proper nouns) for competitive MT systems, providing guidance for constructing future MT test sets. The test sets and the code for preparing variance-aware MT test sets are freely available at https://github.com/NLP2CT/Variance-Aware-MT-Test-Sets .
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2021.
Builds on
23 of 60 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,303
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2019Cross-lingual Language Model Pretrainingcited by 1,088
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
- 2017Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 139
- 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
11 more
- 2020BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocentcited by 109
- 2019Beyond BLEU: Training Neural Machine Translation with Semantic Similaritycited by 84
- 2018Attaining the Unattainable? Reassessing Claims of Human Parity in Neural Machine Translationcited by 58
- 2020Understanding and Improving Lexical Choice in Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 55
- 2016Linguistic Input Features Improve Neural Machine Translationcited by 38
- 2020A Set of Recommendations for Assessing Human-Machine Parity in Language Translationcited by 34
- 2019Domain Adaptation of Neural Machine Translation by Lexicon Inductioncited by 33
- 2017Improving Lexical Choice in Neural Machine Translationcited by 17
- 2020Human-Paraphrased References Improve Neural Machine Translationcited by 15
- 2019Shared-Private Bilingual Word Embeddings for Neural Machine Translationcited by 9
- 2021Difficulty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025How to Select Datapoints for Efficient Human Evaluation of NLG Models?cited by 23
- 2022Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyondcited by 18
- 2025Estimating Machine Translation Difficultycited by 6
- 2025Estimating Machine Translation Difficulty13 Aug 2025
- 2025How to Select Datapoints for Efficient Human Evaluation of NLG Models?30 Jan 2025
- 2022Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyond3 Nov 2022