Don't Count the Edits, Judge by the Outcome Alone: Reward-Based Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Grammatical error correction (GEC) evaluation has traditionally relied on reference or edit overlap, which can penalize valid rewrites that differ from gold corrections. Reference-free metrics reduce this dependence, but evaluating whether a fluent output is a valid correction of the source remains challenging. We propose SURE, a source-conditioned reward evaluator trained on within-source preferences spanning minimal-edit and rewrite-oriented corrections. SURE jointly learns an overall reward with criteria-level supervision for grammaticality, faithfulness, and fluency, together with span-level grounding for source-side error resolution. Experiments on SEEDA show that SURE performs competitively against strong baselines, with particular gains on rewrite-style corrections and more disentangled criteria-level diagnostics. Our code is available at https://github.com/hayeonggg/SURE.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.
Builds on
20 of 44 references.
References · 20
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
8 more
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Studycited by 422
- 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
- 2017JFLEG: A Fluency Corpus and Benchmark for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 97
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 97
- 2022Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyondcited by 18
- 2024GPT-3.5 for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 18
- 2018Reference-less Measure of Faithfulness for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 9
- 2025gec-metrics: A Unified Library for Grammatical Error Correction Evaluationcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.