Grammatical Error Correction as GAN-like Sequence Labeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In Grammatical Error Correction (GEC), sequence labeling models enjoy fast inference compared to sequence-to-sequence models; however, inference in sequence labeling GEC models is an iterative process, as sentences are passed to the model for multiple rounds of correction, which exposes the model to sentences with progressively fewer errors at each round. Traditional GEC models learn from sentences with fixed error rates. Coupling this with the iterative correction process causes a mismatch between training and inference that affects final performance. In order to address this mismatch, we propose a GAN-like sequence labeling model, which consists of a grammatical error detector as a discriminator and a grammatical error labeler with Gumbel-Softmax sampling as a generator. By sampling from real error distributions, our errors are more genuine compared to traditional synthesized GEC errors, thus alleviating the aforementioned mismatch and allowing for better training. Our results on several evaluation benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed approach is effective and improves the previous state-of-the-art baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2021.
Builds on
18 of 37 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
- 2016End-to-end Sequence Labeling via Bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRFcited by 341
- 2020GECToR -- Grammatical Error Correction: Tag, Not Rewritecited by 177
- 2014A* Samplingcited by 151
- 2019Semantics-aware BERT for Language Understandingcited by 112
- 2017JFLEG: A Fluency Corpus and Benchmark for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 97
- 2019Parallel Iterative Edit Models for Local Sequence Transductioncited by 81
- 2020Encoder-Decoder Models Can Benefit from Pre-trained Masked Language Models in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 59
6 more
- 2019An Empirical Study of Incorporating Pseudo Data into Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 55
- 2019Corpora Generation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 53
- 2019Improving Grammatical Error Correction via Pre-Training a Copy-Augmented Architecture with Unlabeled Datacited by 50
- 2021Text Compression-aided Transformer Encodingcited by 13
- 2019Learning to combine Grammatical Error Correctionscited by 9
- 2020Adversarial Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Artcited by 43
- 2022Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyondcited by 18
- 2024GPT-3.5 for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 18
- 2021Seeking Common but Distinguishing Difference, A Joint Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis Modelcited by 13
- 2022Type-Driven Multi-Turn Corrections for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 9
- 2022uChecker: Masked Pretrained Language Models as Unsupervised Chinese Spelling Checkerscited by 9
- 2024GPT-3.5 for Grammatical Error Correction14 May 2024
- 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Art9 Nov 2022
- 2022Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyond3 Nov 2022
- 2022uChecker: Masked Pretrained Language Models as Unsupervised Chinese Spelling Checkers15 Sep 2022
- 2022Type-Driven Multi-Turn Corrections for Grammatical Error Correction17 Mar 2022
- 2021Seeking Common but Distinguishing Difference, A Joint Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis Model18 Nov 2021