Difficulty-Aware Machine Translation Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The high-quality translation results produced by machine translation (MT) systems still pose a huge challenge for automatic evaluation. Current MT evaluation pays the same attention to each sentence component, while the questions of real-world examinations (e.g., university examinations) have different difficulties and weightings. In this paper, we propose a novel difficulty-aware MT evaluation metric, expanding the evaluation dimension by taking translation difficulty into consideration. A translation that fails to be predicted by most MT systems will be treated as a difficult one and assigned a large weight in the final score function, and conversely. Experimental results on the WMT19 English-German Metrics shared tasks show that our proposed method outperforms commonly used MT metrics in terms of human correlation. In particular, our proposed method performs well even when all the MT systems are very competitive, which is when most existing metrics fail to distinguish between them. The source code is freely available at https://github.com/NLP2CT/Difficulty-Aware-MT-Evaluation.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2021.
Builds on
6 of 22 references.
References · 6
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2020Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metricscited by 155
- 2020BLEU might be Guilty but References are not Innocentcited by 109
- 2020Norm-Based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 60
- 2021Meta-Curriculum Learning for Domain Adaptation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 4.
6 papers.
- 2022Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyondcited by 18
- 2025Estimating Machine Translation Difficultycited by 6
- 2021Variance-Aware Machine Translation Test Setscited by 3
- 2025HiMATE: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 3
- 2025Searching the Internet for Challenging Benchmarks at Scalecited by 2
- 2025ChatGPT as a Translation Engine: A Case Study on Japanese-Englishcited by 0
- 2025ChatGPT as a Translation Engine: A Case Study on Japanese-English9 Oct 2025
- 2025Searching the Internet for Challenging Benchmarks at Scale30 Sep 2025
- 2025Estimating Machine Translation Difficulty13 Aug 2025
- 2025HiMATE: A Hierarchical Multi-Agent Framework for Machine Translation Evaluation22 May 2025
- 2022Revisiting Grammatical Error Correction Evaluation and Beyond3 Nov 2022
- 2021Variance-Aware Machine Translation Test Sets7 Nov 2021