Robust Testing for Deep Learning using Human Label Noise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In deep learning (DL) systems, label noise in training datasets often degrades model performance, as models may learn incorrect patterns from mislabeled data. The area of Learning with Noisy Labels (LNL) has introduced methods to effectively train DL models in the presence of noisily-labeled datasets. Traditionally, these methods are tested using synthetic label noise, where ground truth labels are randomly (and automatically) flipped. However, recent findings highlight that models perform substantially worse under human label noise than synthetic label noise, indicating a need for more realistic test scenarios that reflect noise introduced due to imperfect human labeling. This underscores the need for generating realistic noisy labels that simulate human label noise, enabling rigorous testing of deep neural networks without the need to collect new human-labeled datasets. To address this gap, we present Cluster-Based Noise (CBN), a method for generating feature-dependent noise that simulates human-like label noise. Using insights from our case study of label memorization in the CIFAR-10N dataset, we design CBN to create more realistic tests for evaluating LNL methods. Our experiments demonstrate that current LNL methods perform worse when tested using CBN, highlighting its use as a rigorous approach to testing neural networks. Next, we propose Soft Neighbor Label Sampling (SNLS), a method designed to handle CBN, demonstrating its improvement over existing techniques in tackling this more challenging type of noise.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2024.
Builds on
25 of 34 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
- 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
- 2019Does Learning Require Memorization? A Short Tale about a Long Tailcited by 452
13 more
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2021Learning with Feature-Dependent Label Noise: A Progressive Approachcited by 102
- 2020Label Noise Types and Their Effects on Deep Learningcited by 29
- 2020Meta Soft Label Generation for Noisy Labelscited by 21
- 2023Label-Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion Models for Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 20
- 2022Detecting Label Errors by using Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 16
- 2022Bootstrapping the Relationship Between Images and Their Clean and Noisy Labelscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.